Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2010
77.2% pass rate
from 666 tests in 2017
(22% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.9% fail on Brakes (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components
      • 3.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.75% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Front wheels (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.45% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Hoses
    • 0.45% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.15% fail on Locking devices
  • 7.1% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Front lamps
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.75% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.15% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.60% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Battery
    • 0.30% fail on Horn
    • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 6.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.7% fail on Suspension (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.60% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.75% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.75% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.15% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 0.75% fail on Steering
    • 0.60% fail on Steering system
      • 0.60% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.15% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment
  • 0.30% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Exhaust system
  • 0.30% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.15% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.15% fail on Body condition

Search Good Garages