MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Land Cruiser » 2010

Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2010
74.4% pass rate
from 700 tests in 2021
(32% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.3% fail on Brakes
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.43% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt
          • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.71% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.71% fail on Lever
    • 0.43% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.29% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.29% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.14% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.14% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.14% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
  • 6.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Stop lamp (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.43% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.29% fail on Horn
      • 0.14% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 5.7% fail on Suspension (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.43% fail on Springs (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket
    • 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.29% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.29% fail on Suspension rod (67 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.14% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.14% fail on Levelling valve
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.43% fail on Condition of glass (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Windscreen (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on View to rear
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.86% fail on Tread depth (75% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.14% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 1.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.14% fail on Pipe
    • 0.14% fail on Body
      • 0.14% fail on Other body component
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
  • 1.0% fail on Steering
    • 0.86% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.71% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.14% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
  • 0.71% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.57% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on Hubs
  • 0.14% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.14% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages