Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2009
73.2% pass rate
from 463 tests in 2020
(28% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.7% fail on Brakes
    • 4.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (97% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Brake pads (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.65% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.65% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.22% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.86% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.43% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.43% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.22% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.22% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.4% fail on Suspension (34% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Springs (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs (74% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 6.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.65% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.22% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.22% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.22% fail on Horn
    • 0.43% fail on Stop lamp (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 5.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.22% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.0% fail on Transmission
      • 2.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.8% fail on Joints
      • 0.22% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.22% fail on Joints
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Pipe (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.22% fail on Towbar
      • 0.22% fail on Safety device
      • 0.22% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.22% fail on Body
      • 0.22% fail on Other body component
  • 1.5% fail on Tyres (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Tread depth (83% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (66% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.65% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.86% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
  • 0.86% fail on Steering
    • 0.86% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.86% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.43% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.43% fail on Attachment
  • 0.22% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages