Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results
Registered in 200867.4% pass rate
from 687 tests in 2021
(20% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
5.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.58% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.15% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.15% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 0.73% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.73% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.44% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.73% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.6% fail on Brake pads
-
0.73% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.73% fail on Brake discs
-
2.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.73% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.73% fail on Lever
-
0.44% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(18 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Prescribed areas
(40 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (196 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Other components
-
0.29% fail on
Prescribed areas
(40 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.15% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.15% fail on Hand lever
- 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.15% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
5.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(30% better than other 2008 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(54% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.58% fail on Ball joint
- 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(47% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint
- 0.87% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.73% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.58% fail on
Springs
(90% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Mounting
- 0.15% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.44% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.44% fail on Ball joint
- 0.15% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.29% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
(13 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Operation (32 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Bellows
- 0.15% fail on Levelling valve
-
6.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(54% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(76% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Transmission
(170% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.15% fail on Joints
-
7.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.73% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.73% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.29% fail on
Chassis
- 0.29% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.29% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.29% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Body
- 0.15% fail on Mounting fixings
- 0.15% fail on Other body component
-
0.29% fail on
Seats
- 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.15% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.15% fail on Bumpers
-
0.15% fail on
Cabs
- 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.15% fail on Undertray
-
7.3% fail on
Transmission
(170% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(36% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(190% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(190% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(190% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Stop lamp (81% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.29% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.15% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.15% fail on Position lamp
- 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
-
4.1% fail on
Visibility
- 3.2% fail on Wipers
- 0.73% fail on Washers (77% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Bonnet
-
3.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.3% fail on
Compression ignition
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.29% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.15% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.29% fail on
Spark ignition
(92% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Compression ignition
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.15% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
3.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end
-
0.29% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.29% fail on Steering rack
-
0.15% fail on
Steering play
- 0.15% fail on Steering rack
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.0% fail on
Tyres
(69% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth (60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.0% fail on Registration plates
-
1.0% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.0% fail on Attachment