Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2005
66.0% pass rate
from 1,967 tests in 2017
(24% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (22% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.10% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Fog lamp (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (67% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (71% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Battery
    • 0.20% fail on Direction indicators (93% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Flashing type (93% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.051% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.20% fail on Horn
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 12% fail on Suspension (36% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
      • 0.051% fail on Linkage condition
    • 4.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.051% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.051% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (59% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.41% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition (93% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Location
    • 0.41% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.36% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.051% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.20% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Air suspension (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Operation (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.051% fail on Condition
      • 0.051% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.051% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.051% fail on Attachment
    • 0.051% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 4.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.3% fail on Components
        • 4.2% fail on Pipes (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Hoses (74% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.31% fail on Leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance (38% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear wheels (50% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.36% fail on Brake operation (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.051% fail on Parking brake operation
      • 0.051% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Hub components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (36% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake discs (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.051% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.31% fail on ABS (66% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.051% fail on Linkage
      • 0.051% fail on Lever
      • 0.051% fail on Cable
      • 0.051% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.051% fail on Pivot
    • 0.15% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.10% fail on Locking devices (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 5.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (30% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (59% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.10% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.051% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 4.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.36% fail on Emissions (83% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres (72% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth (69% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Size/type
  • 2.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.051% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.81% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.66% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas (73% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.86% fail on Steering (78% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Steering system (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack (84% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.10% fail on Steering control
      • 0.10% fail on Steering coupling (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Universal joint (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Power steering
      • 0.051% fail on Operation
    • 0.051% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.76% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.71% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (48% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Body condition
    • 0.15% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.15% fail on Chassis
    • 0.051% fail on Doors
      • 0.051% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.051% fail on Seats
      • 0.051% fail on Passengers
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.36% fail on Attachment
  • 0.051% fail on Towbars
    • 0.051% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages