MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Land Cruiser » 2005

Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2005
63.9% pass rate
from 2,031 tests in 2021
(18% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (57% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage
      • 0.098% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.84% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Springs (77% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Coil springs (80% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Coil spring (81% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.049% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.049% fail on Attachment bracket
    • 0.49% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.34% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.25% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes (39 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Operation
      • 0.049% fail on Levelling valve
    • 0.098% fail on Axles
      • 0.049% fail on Axle
      • 0.049% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.098% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.049% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.049% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 6.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.54% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.098% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.098% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (32% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (48% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.049% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.098% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.098% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.049% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.59% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.44% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.098% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.30% fail on Brake discs and drums (76% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Brake discs (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.15% fail on Linkage (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Cable
        • 0.049% fail on Pivot
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.25% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.64% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.64% fail on Lever
    • 0.34% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.098% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.20% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.20% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Other braking system component (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.049% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.049% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.049% fail on Valves
    • 0.049% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.049% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (20% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (80% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Switch
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (69% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.89% fail on Direction indicators (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Flashing type (66% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Individual direction indicators (69% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters (70% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.44% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.25% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.098% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Horn
    • 0.39% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.39% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.098% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.049% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.049% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Transmission (49% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Joints (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.25% fail on Joints
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.30% fail on Tank
      • 0.049% fail on Pipe
      • 0.049% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.34% fail on Body
      • 0.20% fail on Other body component
      • 0.049% fail on Body condition
      • 0.049% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.049% fail on Panel
    • 0.30% fail on Cabs (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Vehicle structure (64 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Coupling
    • 0.098% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.098% fail on Seats
      • 0.049% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.049% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.098% fail on Undertray
    • 0.049% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.049% fail on Carrier
    • 0.049% fail on Load security
      • 0.049% fail on Access panel
  • 4.9% fail on Visibility (34% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.049% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.049% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
    • 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (57% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (60% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.44% fail on Spark ignition (91% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Catalyst emissions (87% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested (82% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.049% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.049% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.34% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.25% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Transmission oil leaks (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 2.0% fail on Steering (50% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components (48% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end (47% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.049% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.30% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.098% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.098% fail on Other components
  • 1.5% fail on Tyres (77% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Tread depth (79% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.54% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages