Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2005
64.7% pass rate
from 2,121 tests in 2020
(23% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (29% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (44% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.14% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (30% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (91% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (92% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (78% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.28% fail on Horn
      • 0.24% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.094% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.28% fail on Direction indicators (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Flashing type (90% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Individual direction indicators (87% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.094% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.047% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.047% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 12% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.094% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.094% fail on Linkage
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (51% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes (91% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.90% fail on Springs (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Coil springs (84% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Coil spring (86% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Shock absorbers (53% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.094% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.047% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.28% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Suspension unit (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Levelling valve (68 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.094% fail on Suspension rod (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.094% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.047% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.094% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.047% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.047% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.047% fail on Axles
      • 0.047% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (47% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.094% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.42% fail on Brake discs and drums (69% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Brake discs (69% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.094% fail on Cable
        • 0.047% fail on Lever
        • 0.047% fail on Linkage
        • 0.047% fail on Pivot
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance (46% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (40% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (44% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (63% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.094% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.99% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.094% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.094% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.047% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.047% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.28% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (66% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance (78% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.094% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.85% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.42% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.71% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.71% fail on Lever
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.047% fail on Pedal
    • 0.28% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (52 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.094% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.094% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.047% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.047% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (27% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Transmission (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Joints (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.47% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.47% fail on Joints (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.047% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.66% fail on Chassis (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Chassis condition (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Tank
      • 0.047% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.38% fail on Towbar (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Vehicle structure (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Other towbar components (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Body
      • 0.094% fail on Other body component
      • 0.047% fail on Body condition
      • 0.047% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Spare wheel condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Carrier
    • 0.094% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.094% fail on Seats
      • 0.094% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.094% fail on Cabs (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Doors
      • 0.047% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.047% fail on Door condition
  • 4.8% fail on Visibility (37% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear
      • 0.094% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.047% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.094% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.094% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.99% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.52% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
    • 0.047% fail on Airbags
      • 0.047% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (60% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (60% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (90% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.047% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.14% fail on Spark ignition (97% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (97% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.094% fail on Fluid leaks (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.047% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.047% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.047% fail on Undertray
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres (74% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (73% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (61% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components (59% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end (57% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.094% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.047% fail on Other components
    • 0.094% fail on Steering gear (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Steering rack (84% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Steering column
    • 0.047% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.047% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.047% fail on Steering play
      • 0.047% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Attachment
  • 0.19% fail on Identification of the vehicle (72% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plates (72% better than other 2005 cars)

Search Good Garages