Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2004
63.2% pass rate
from 2,031 tests in 2017
(22% better than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (24% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (28% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Rear lamps (48% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (65% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (90% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Fog lamp (94% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (75% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.049% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.59% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Flashing type (81% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Individual lamps (82% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Battery (63% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Horn
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.098% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.098% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 17% fail on Suspension (16% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (41% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (53% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
      • 0.098% fail on Linkage condition (79% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Presence
    • 5.9% fail on Drive shafts (55% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Front drive shafts (53% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (53% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Couplings
      • 0.15% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms (51% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (48% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Coil springs (71% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Location
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Front (81% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.84% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.44% fail on Spring mounting (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment (12 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Condition
      • 0.049% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.20% fail on Panhard rods (33 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment (237 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Fluid suspension (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Operation
      • 0.049% fail on Levelling valve
      • 0.049% fail on Pipes
    • 0.15% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.098% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.098% fail on Attachment (33 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.15% fail on Torque/reaction arms (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment (92 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Air suspension (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Operation
      • 0.049% fail on Levelling valve
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 5.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.4% fail on Components
        • 5.3% fail on Pipes (43% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.049% fail on Hoses
      • 0.34% fail on Leaks
      • 0.098% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.098% fail on Operation
    • 5.0% fail on Brake performance (35% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels (44% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.49% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake operation (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.049% fail on Parking brake operation
      • 0.049% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 4.9% fail on Hub components (42% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Brake pads (73% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.049% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.89% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.89% fail on Condition
    • 0.64% fail on ABS
    • 0.44% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.25% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.20% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.098% fail on Pivot (22 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage
      • 0.049% fail on Relay lever
      • 0.049% fail on Clevis joint
    • 0.098% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.049% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.049% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.049% fail on Pedal
        • 0.049% fail on Condition
  • 6.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (25% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (55% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Windscreen (80% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.098% fail on Indirect vision devices (21 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 3.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (48% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system (38% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.49% fail on Emissions (82% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Tank
      • 0.098% fail on System
      • 0.049% fail on Cap
  • 2.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.049% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
      • 0.39% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.049% fail on Requirements
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres (78% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Tread depth (83% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition
    • 0.44% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.44% fail on Chassis
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Passengers
    • 0.098% fail on Speedometer (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Body security
    • 0.049% fail on Doors
      • 0.049% fail on Passengers other
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (74% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Steering system (78% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.20% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.15% fail on Steering control
      • 0.098% fail on Steering column
      • 0.049% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.049% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.74% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.74% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.20% fail on Towbars (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar (15 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages