Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2002
63.2% pass rate
from 1,142 tests in 2020
(24% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (25% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.088% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.53% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.44% fail on Trailer electrical socket (24 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Horn
      • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.96% fail on Direction indicators (59% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Flashing type (59% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.088% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (25 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (74% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (70% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance (69% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.35% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.088% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.088% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.088% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.088% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (45% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (66% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance (64% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.088% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.088% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.088% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.61% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Pivot (72 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Clevis joint (194 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Linkage (19 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.088% fail on Cable
      • 0.88% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.79% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.088% fail on Brake drums
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Lever (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.79% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.44% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.44% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.088% fail on Pedal
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.088% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.088% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.088% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.088% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.088% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.088% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 14% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Pins and bushes (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage ball joints (57% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Anti-roll bar (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (74% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.088% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.088% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms (45% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.53% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Pins and bushes (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.18% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.53% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.088% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.44% fail on Springs (87% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.088% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.26% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.18% fail on Suspension rod (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.26% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Operation (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Accumulator
      • 0.088% fail on Pipes
    • 0.088% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.088% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 9.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Transmission (38% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts (40% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Joints (41% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.088% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.18% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.18% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.088% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.79% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.44% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Tank
    • 0.79% fail on Towbar (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Other towbar components (40 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Chassis
      • 0.70% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.61% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.35% fail on Body
      • 0.26% fail on Mounting fixings (31 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Panel
    • 0.35% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.088% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.18% fail on Cabs
      • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.7% fail on Visibility (44% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers (44% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (57% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.35% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.18% fail on View to rear
      • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.9% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack (89% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components (55% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end (65% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.53% fail on Power steering
      • 0.26% fail on Other components
      • 0.18% fail on Pump (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Operation
      • 0.088% fail on Rams
    • 0.35% fail on Steering play
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.088% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.088% fail on Steering wheel
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (57% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (47% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (66% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition (78% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.088% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.53% fail on Spark ignition (92% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (91% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested (82% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.088% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.088% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.26% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.088% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.088% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.088% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.088% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (44% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.53% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.44% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.44% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages