Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2002
62.4% pass rate
from 1,045 tests in 2017
(24% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (26% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Front lamps (38% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.096% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.9% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.096% fail on Switch
    • 0.86% fail on Headlamps (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Headlamp (81% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Direction indicators (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Flashing type (75% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.096% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.57% fail on Horn
    • 0.38% fail on Trailer electrical socket (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
      • 0.096% fail on Lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Battery (80% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.096% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 8.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.86% fail on Front wheels (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.19% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.096% fail on Parking brake operation
      • 0.096% fail on Brake operation
    • 4.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (34% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Components (41% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.096% fail on Hoses
        • 0.096% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.57% fail on Leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Hub components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.67% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.096% fail on Brake back plates
    • 2.5% fail on Parking brake (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Mechanical components (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage (77 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Lever (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Clevis joint (194 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pivot (91 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Cable
    • 0.86% fail on ABS
    • 0.57% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.48% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.48% fail on Pedal
        • 0.48% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.19% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.096% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.096% fail on Components
        • 0.096% fail on Servos
    • 0.096% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.096% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 14% fail on Suspension (37% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (35% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.57% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Presence
    • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front drive shafts (57% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (57% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Front
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (64% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Component mounting (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.096% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.48% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment (23 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on General condition (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.096% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.096% fail on Condition
    • 0.096% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.096% fail on Condition
  • 5.6% fail on Driver's view of the road (41% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers (42% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (56% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (50% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.38% fail on Tank
      • 0.38% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on System
    • 0.48% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.29% fail on Emissions (92% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (66% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (57% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Condition (80% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.096% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Steering (42% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Steering system (47% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.86% fail on Track rod end (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.096% fail on Free play
        • 0.096% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.48% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.096% fail on Operation
      • 0.096% fail on Pump
      • 0.096% fail on Other components
    • 0.096% fail on Steering control
      • 0.096% fail on Steering column
  • 1.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.96% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.96% fail on Chassis
    • 0.86% fail on Body condition
  • 1.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (72% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Seat belts (73% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.096% fail on Requirements
      • 0.096% fail on Attachment
      • 0.096% fail on Installation check
        • 0.096% fail on Anchorage's
      • 0.096% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.48% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (70% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.96% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.96% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages