Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2000
59.0% pass rate
from 909 tests in 2017
(16% better than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.22% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Fog lamp (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Tell tale
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (62% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (68% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.22% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (52% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (52% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.88% fail on Horn
    • 0.55% fail on Battery
    • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 17% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.88% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.55% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (46% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Fitment
    • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts (59% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front drive shafts (59% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (58% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.2% fail on Tie bars/rods (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Attachment (54 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Condition (15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.99% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on Coil springs (82% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Location
    • 0.33% fail on Wheel bearings (83% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Front
    • 0.22% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.22% fail on Panhard rods (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment (56 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Axles
      • 0.11% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.11% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.11% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 0.11% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.5% fail on Parking brake performance (52% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.99% fail on Front wheels (69% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.22% fail on Parking brake operation (42 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (41% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Components (42% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes (41% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Valves
        • 0.44% fail on Hoses (71% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.33% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.33% fail on Leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.11% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.11% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.2% fail on Parking brake (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on ABS
    • 0.77% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Cable
      • 0.11% fail on Brake slack adjuster
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage
      • 0.11% fail on Pivot
    • 0.77% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal
        • 0.22% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 6.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (36% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (64% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.33% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.33% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (54% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Vehicle structure (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Body condition
    • 0.33% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers
    • 0.11% fail on Body security
  • 5.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (51% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system (39% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions (76% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.44% fail on Cap
      • 0.33% fail on Pipe
      • 0.22% fail on System
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
    • 0.77% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.0% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering system
      • 2.3% fail on Steering rack (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Free play
        • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.44% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Pump
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 0.22% fail on Steering control
      • 0.22% fail on Steering column (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (45% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.77% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.11% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.3% fail on Tyres (73% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (65% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 0.99% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.99% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.66% fail on Towbars (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.11% fail on Towbar
    • 0.11% fail on Detachable tow ball
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages