MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Land Cruiser » 2000

Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2000
59.9% pass rate
from 915 tests in 2020
(14% better than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (51% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (50% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.87% fail on Direction indicators (64% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Flashing type (64% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.66% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.33% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.11% fail on Horn
    • 0.33% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.33% fail on Switch
    • 0.22% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamp switch
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 7.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (59% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.98% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.87% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.98% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.77% fail on Springs (71% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.33% fail on Coil springs (87% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Mounting
        • 0.11% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.44% fail on Axles
      • 0.44% fail on Axle (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.22% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.22% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 9.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (64% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance (96% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.33% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.44% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (82% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (78% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance (87% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Cable
        • 0.33% fail on Linkage (30 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Pivot (31 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Lever
        • 0.11% fail on Relay lever
        • 0.11% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.77% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.77% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.87% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.87% fail on Lever
    • 0.66% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
    • 0.55% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (66% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Anti-lock braking system (69% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.22% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Chassis (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Chassis condition (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (91% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (95% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission (50% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (63% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (62% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.44% fail on Joints
        • 0.11% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.2% fail on Towbar (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.98% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.66% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.87% fail on Body
      • 0.33% fail on Mounting fixings (19 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Panel
      • 0.22% fail on Other body component
      • 0.11% fail on Body condition
    • 0.22% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Cabs
      • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Steps
    • 0.11% fail on Undertray
  • 5.0% fail on Visibility (39% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.0% fail on Steering gear (99% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Steering rack (97% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components (52% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Track rod end (67% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.11% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.55% fail on Power steering
      • 0.33% fail on Other components
      • 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.22% fail on Steering play
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.11% fail on Steering wheel
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (68% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (71% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Spark ignition (91% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Catalyst emissions (91% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.55% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.3% fail on Tyres (63% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.87% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.87% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.11% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.11% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages