MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Land Cruiser » 2000

Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2000
66.0% pass rate
from 836 tests in 2021
(20% better than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 9.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (86% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.36% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.24% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.48% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance (77% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.84% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.84% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.72% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Cable
        • 0.24% fail on Linkage (25 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Lever
        • 0.12% fail on Pivot
    • 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.48% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.36% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.12% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (55% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.72% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.24% fail on Trailer electrical socket (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.24% fail on Horn
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.24% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.12% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 6.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (60% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Linkage
      • 0.72% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.48% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.48% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.84% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.60% fail on Springs (79% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.24% fail on Coil springs (91% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Mounting
    • 0.48% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.36% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.24% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.5% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission (52% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (62% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (61% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.48% fail on Joints
    • 0.60% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.36% fail on Pipe
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.36% fail on Body
      • 0.24% fail on Other body component
      • 0.12% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.24% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
      • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.12% fail on Cabs
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on Undertray
  • 4.3% fail on Visibility (45% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers (43% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (65% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (55% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (60% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.60% fail on Spark ignition (92% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Catalyst emissions (93% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.60% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.72% fail on Track rod end (63% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.36% fail on Steering play
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres (62% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.60% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.24% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.24% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.12% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.12% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages