MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Land Cruiser » 1999

Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 1999
60.1% pass rate
from 936 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (31% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp (46% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (53% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Headlamp levelling device (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.75% fail on Horn
      • 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.53% fail on Hazard warning (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 8.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 2.7% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (88% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (57% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt (sp) (65% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance (67% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.75% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Lever (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Pivot (48 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Linkage (18 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.43% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.75% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.64% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.43% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
    • 0.32% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.21% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.11% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.11% fail on Leaks
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 4.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.75% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.85% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.53% fail on Springs (78% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.11% fail on Mounting
    • 0.53% fail on Suspension rods (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Suspension rod (32 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.32% fail on Axles
      • 0.32% fail on Axle (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Strengthening plate (22 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Transmission
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.75% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.75% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.32% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.21% fail on Pipe
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
    • 0.64% fail on Body
      • 0.21% fail on Mounting fixings (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Other body component
      • 0.11% fail on Body condition
      • 0.11% fail on Panel
    • 0.43% fail on Towbar (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Vehicle structure (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Cabs
      • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.11% fail on Undertray
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (52% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Requirements
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.2% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Track rod end (76% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
        • 0.11% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.32% fail on Steering play
      • 0.32% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Steering wheel
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (61% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (66% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Compression ignition (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition (83% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Catalyst emissions (85% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested (74% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.64% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.53% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres (53% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.96% fail on Tread depth (59% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.85% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.53% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.53% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages