Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 1999
57.0% pass rate
from 1,089 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.18% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp (33% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Fog lamp (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.092% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (59% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.092% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.092% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.092% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 0.83% fail on Direction indicators (71% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Flashing type (71% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Individual lamps (70% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.092% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.092% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.092% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.092% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.092% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.092% fail on Switch
    • 0.092% fail on Horn
  • 15% fail on Suspension (28% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (44% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.73% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.18% fail on Fitment (118 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms (49% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (46% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (65% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Component mounting (62% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.1% fail on Tie bars/rods (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Attachment (24 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front drive shafts (72% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (71% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.92% fail on Front
    • 0.46% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Coil springs (87% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition (93% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Location
    • 0.18% fail on Air suspension (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Operation (46 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Panhard rods (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment (27 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Condition
    • 0.092% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.092% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.092% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.092% fail on Condition
    • 0.092% fail on Axles
      • 0.092% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.092% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 8.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Front wheels (66% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.092% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 5.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.4% fail on Components
        • 4.4% fail on Pipes
        • 1.3% fail on Hoses
        • 0.18% fail on Valves
      • 0.46% fail on Leaks
      • 0.37% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.092% fail on Operation
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.37% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.37% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Mechanical components (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Lever (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Clevis joint (178 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage (30 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Cable
      • 0.092% fail on Pivot
    • 0.64% fail on ABS
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Condition
        • 0.092% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.18% fail on Locking devices (25 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
      • 0.092% fail on Operation
  • 5.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (42% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (58% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.092% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (53% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system (40% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions (77% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on Pipe
      • 0.37% fail on System
      • 0.28% fail on Tank
      • 0.18% fail on Cap
    • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested (75% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 4.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.2% fail on Vehicle structure (88% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis (88% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Body condition
    • 0.28% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
      • 0.092% fail on Passengers
    • 0.18% fail on Speedometer (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Doors
      • 0.092% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.092% fail on Load security
      • 0.092% fail on Access panel
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (62% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (43% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Condition (90% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.2% fail on Steering system (43% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.92% fail on Track rod end (60% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Free play
        • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.092% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.092% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.092% fail on Other components
        • 0.092% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.55% fail on Power steering
      • 0.28% fail on Other components
      • 0.092% fail on Operation
      • 0.092% fail on Pump
      • 0.092% fail on Rams
    • 0.18% fail on Steering control
      • 0.18% fail on Steering column (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (49% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas (50% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Condition
      • 0.092% fail on Requirements
      • 0.092% fail on Installation check
        • 0.092% fail on Belt(s)/padding
    • 0.092% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.092% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.7% fail on Towbars (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Towbar (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.55% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.55% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages