Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 1999
57.9% pass rate
from 1,120 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Brakes (22% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (31% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (82% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.27% fail on Plate brake tester (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.089% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.089% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.089% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.089% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.089% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.27% fail on Decelerometer (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (64% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance (85% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Brake performance not tested (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.89% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Relay lever (88 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Lever
        • 0.18% fail on Linkage (21 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Clevis joint (44 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Pivot (31 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Cable
      • 0.18% fail on Brake discs and drums (81% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Brake discs (80% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Lever (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.89% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.71% fail on Hand lever (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
    • 0.71% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.45% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.27% fail on Reservoirs (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.27% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.18% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.089% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.18% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.18% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.27% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.98% fail on Pins and bushes (51% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers (96% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Axles (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Axle (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Swivel joints/housing
      • 0.089% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.71% fail on Springs (68% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Coil springs (74% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Coil spring (82% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Mounting (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.089% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.089% fail on Torsion bar
    • 0.63% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.089% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.54% fail on Wheel bearings (64% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.089% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.089% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.27% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Operation
      • 0.089% fail on Accumulator
      • 0.089% fail on Pipes
    • 0.089% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.089% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.089% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.089% fail on Sub-frame
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (42% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (42% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.089% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.54% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.45% fail on Horn
      • 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.89% fail on Direction indicators (63% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Flashing type (67% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Individual direction indicators (62% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.089% fail on Switch
      • 0.089% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.089% fail on Arm
    • 0.18% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 0.18% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.089% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.089% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Chassis (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis condition (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.0% fail on Towbar (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Other towbar components
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission (44% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (49% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Joints (48% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.18% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.18% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.36% fail on Pipe
      • 0.27% fail on Tank
      • 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.27% fail on System
      • 0.089% fail on Hose
    • 0.71% fail on Body
      • 0.36% fail on Panel
      • 0.27% fail on Mounting fixings (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Other body component
    • 0.27% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.27% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.089% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.18% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.18% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.089% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.089% fail on Cabs
      • 0.089% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.089% fail on Undertray
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility (26% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (62% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.18% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.089% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.089% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (59% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (65% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition (82% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Catalyst emissions (84% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.089% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.71% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.71% fail on Condition
      • 0.089% fail on Attachment
      • 0.089% fail on Requirements
    • 0.089% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components (54% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.089% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.089% fail on Other components
        • 0.089% fail on Steering component
    • 0.45% fail on Steering play (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering column (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (49% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.80% fail on Condition (66% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Size/type
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment
    • 0.089% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages