Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 1998
58.1% pass rate
from 1,337 tests in 2017
(11% better than other 1998 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (34% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Fog lamp (130% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.075% fail on Switch
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (51% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (8 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.97% fail on Battery
    • 0.67% fail on Horn
    • 0.52% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Flashing type (81% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Individual lamps (74% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.45% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 0.075% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake performance (59% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Front wheels (60% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.67% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake operation (32 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.22% fail on Gradient hand brake (21 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake operation
    • 7.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.4% fail on Components
        • 4.5% fail on Pipes
        • 2.8% fail on Hoses
        • 0.67% fail on Valves
        • 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.075% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.60% fail on Leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.37% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.075% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.7% fail on Parking brake (170% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Mechanical components (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Cable
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage (30 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Lever (10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Clevis joint (40 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pivot (124 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.75% fail on ABS
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.52% fail on Pedal
        • 0.45% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (16 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 16% fail on Suspension (22% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (87% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage condition (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.45% fail on Attachment
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas (45% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Component mounting (36% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.075% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers (63% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (63% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (60% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (64% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment
    • 0.82% fail on Tie bars/rods (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Attachment (19 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.75% fail on Wheel bearings (56% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Front
      • 0.075% fail on Rear
    • 0.45% fail on Panhard rods (12 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Attachment (49 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Condition
      • 0.075% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.37% fail on Axles (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Axle beam (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.30% fail on Drive shafts (93% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Front drive shafts (93% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Constant velocity joints (93% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (89% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Torque/reaction arms (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment (61 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.075% fail on Operation
      • 0.075% fail on Pipes
    • 0.075% fail on Air suspension
      • 0.075% fail on Levelling valve
    • 0.075% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.075% fail on Attachment
  • 5.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (48% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system (33% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions (69% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
      • 0.22% fail on System
      • 0.15% fail on Tank
      • 0.15% fail on Cap
    • 0.52% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.9% fail on Driver's view of the road (45% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.97% fail on Washers (71% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.075% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.075% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.1% fail on Steering system
      • 1.8% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.60% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Free play (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.15% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.45% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.075% fail on Operation
    • 0.37% fail on Steering control (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Steering column (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Steering lock (18 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Steering operation
  • 3.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.5% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis
    • 0.075% fail on Doors
      • 0.075% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.075% fail on Seats
      • 0.075% fail on Drivers
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (56% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Condition (77% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (61% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts (50% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (64% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
      • 0.075% fail on Attachment
    • 0.075% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.075% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.97% fail on Towbars (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Towbar (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages