Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 1997
61.5% pass rate
from 1,408 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes (22% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 10% fail on Brake performance (31% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (81% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (12 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.071% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.071% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.071% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.071% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (63% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 1997 cars)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (64% better than other 1997 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance (76% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (74% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (85% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads (86% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.071% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.2% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Pivot (40 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Linkage (24 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Cable
        • 0.14% fail on Lever
        • 0.14% fail on Relay lever (29 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.071% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.21% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.21% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Lever (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
    • 0.64% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.28% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.071% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.071% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.43% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.14% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (89% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system (88% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.071% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.071% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.071% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.071% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.071% fail on Other components
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (180% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage (10 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.43% fail on Anti-roll bar (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.92% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint (61% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.21% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (34% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.99% fail on Springs
      • 0.57% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.57% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.43% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.85% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.071% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.071% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.71% fail on Wheel bearings (56% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Suspension rods (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (34 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.43% fail on Axles
      • 0.28% fail on Axle (14 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on King pins
      • 0.071% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (41% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (57% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (57% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.071% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.36% fail on Horn
      • 0.28% fail on Trailer electrical socket (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.071% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.071% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.8% fail on Chassis (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis condition (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.50% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Pipe
      • 0.14% fail on Hose
      • 0.071% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission (67% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Drive shafts (81% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Joints (81% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.21% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.21% fail on Joints
        • 0.071% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.85% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Other towbar components (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Body
      • 0.28% fail on Mounting fixings (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Panel
      • 0.071% fail on Other body component
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.071% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.071% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.071% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.071% fail on Cabs
      • 0.071% fail on Steps
    • 0.071% fail on Undertray
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (38% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.36% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.28% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.21% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.071% fail on View to rear
      • 0.071% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (47% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.99% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.071% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
          • 0.071% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.071% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition (84% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Catalyst emissions (85% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested (73% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.071% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.071% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.64% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.57% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.071% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.071% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.071% fail on Undertray
  • 3.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.71% fail on Track rod end (55% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
        • 0.14% fail on Steering component (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.071% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.14% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.071% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
      • 0.071% fail on Operation
      • 0.071% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.28% fail on Steering play
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.071% fail on Universal joint
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.85% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (73% better than other 1997 cars)
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (45% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.071% fail on Size/type
  • 0.85% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
  • 0.071% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.071% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages