Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 1996
61.0% pass rate
from 953 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 1996 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Fog lamp (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.10% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.94% fail on Battery
    • 0.94% fail on Headlamps (68% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Horn
    • 0.31% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.10% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.21% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.0% fail on Parking brake performance (95% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.84% fail on Front wheels (76% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.52% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake operation (44 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.10% fail on Gradient hand brake
      • 0.10% fail on Brake operation
    • 7.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.0% fail on Components
        • 4.2% fail on Pipes
        • 2.6% fail on Hoses
        • 0.94% fail on Valves (160% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.10% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.42% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
      • 0.10% fail on Leaks
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.84% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.10% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.3% fail on Parking brake (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on ABS
    • 0.73% fail on Restricted movement (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Cable
      • 0.21% fail on Pivot (51 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage
      • 0.10% fail on Lever
    • 0.31% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.31% fail on Pedal
        • 0.21% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 15% fail on Suspension (22% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (71% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage condition (9 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.2% fail on Front (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas (71% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Component mounting (69% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.31% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.31% fail on Panhard rods (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.31% fail on Drive shafts (91% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.10% fail on Universal joint
        • 0.10% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.10% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.21% fail on Axles
      • 0.10% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.10% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 8.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (26% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Emissions (69% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.42% fail on Pipe
      • 0.42% fail on System
      • 0.31% fail on Tank
      • 0.10% fail on Cap
  • 4.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Steering system
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.73% fail on Track rod end (59% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Free play
        • 0.42% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.21% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
        • 0.21% fail on Steering pivot point
      • 0.10% fail on Steering damper
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering
      • 0.31% fail on Operation
      • 0.31% fail on Other components
      • 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.21% fail on Pump
    • 0.21% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.10% fail on Steering control
      • 0.10% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.10% fail on Universal joint
  • 4.6% fail on Driver's view of the road (47% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers (42% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Washers (73% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.31% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.2% fail on Body condition
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis
    • 0.63% fail on Seats
      • 0.42% fail on Passengers
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers
      • 0.10% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.10% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.10% fail on Body security
  • 3.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (34% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (56% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.31% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres (54% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.63% fail on Condition (77% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.84% fail on Towbars
    • 0.52% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.31% fail on Towbar (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages