Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results
Registered in 199569.7% pass rate
from 231 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(140% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.87% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
4.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
-
1.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.87% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.43% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(140% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
-
0.87% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Lever
- 0.43% fail on Clevis joint
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.87% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Pedal
- 0.87% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.43% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.43% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.43% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.43% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.43% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Suspension
-
6.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.43% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint
- 0.43% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 3.5% fail on Wheel bearings
-
2.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.87% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Springs
-
1.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.3% fail on Coil spring
- 0.43% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.87% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.43% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
-
6.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp
- 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.87% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.43% fail on Horn
-
0.43% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.43% fail on Position lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.43% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.43% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.43% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
-
5.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.3% fail on
Seats
- 0.87% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.43% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.43% fail on
Transmission
-
0.43% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.43% fail on Joints
-
0.43% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.43% fail on
Body
- 0.43% fail on Panel
-
5.2% fail on
Visibility
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.2% fail on Washers
-
0.43% fail on
View to rear
- 0.43% fail on Mirrors
-
4.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.87% fail on
Spark ignition
(86% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.87% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.43% fail on Other leaks
-
3.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.43% fail on Condition
- 0.87% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.2% fail on
Steering
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.87% fail on Drag link end
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint
-
0.43% fail on
Other components
- 0.43% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.43% fail on
Power steering
- 0.43% fail on Other components
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.7% fail on
Tyres
- 0.87% fail on Condition
- 0.87% fail on Tread depth
-
0.43% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.43% fail on Registration plates