Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 1995
67.8% pass rate
from 317 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.32% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.6% fail on Horn
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.95% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.32% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.32% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.32% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 2.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 0.95% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.32% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.63% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.95% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Clevis joint (106 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Relay lever
        • 0.32% fail on Pivot
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.3% fail on Lever
    • 0.95% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.95% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.63% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.63% fail on Pedal
    • 0.63% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.63% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.63% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.32% fail on Valves
    • 0.32% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.32% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.32% fail on Other braking system component
  • 8.8% fail on Suspension
    • 3.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.95% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.63% fail on Linkage
      • 0.32% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.63% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (75% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Axles
      • 0.32% fail on Axle
      • 0.32% fail on Swivel joints/housing
      • 0.32% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.95% fail on Springs
      • 0.95% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.95% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.63% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.32% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.32% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.32% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.32% fail on View to rear
      • 0.32% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (43% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Seats
      • 1.3% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Driver's seat
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.95% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.32% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.32% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.95% fail on Transmission
      • 0.63% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.63% fail on Joints
      • 0.32% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.32% fail on Joints
    • 0.63% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.63% fail on Body
      • 0.63% fail on Panel
    • 0.32% fail on Chassis
      • 0.32% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.32% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.32% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.32% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.32% fail on Carrier
    • 0.32% fail on Towbar
      • 0.32% fail on Other towbar components
  • 5.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.5% fail on Spark ignition (63% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (71% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.32% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.32% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.32% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.63% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.32% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.32% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.5% fail on Steering
    • 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.95% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.32% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.32% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.32% fail on Other components
        • 0.32% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.32% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.32% fail on Power steering
      • 0.32% fail on Operation
    • 0.32% fail on Steering column
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.63% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.63% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages