Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results
Registered in 199266.9% pass rate
from 121 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Decelerometer
(45 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (45 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.7% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.83% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 0.83% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.83% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.83% fail on
Rbt
- 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.83% fail on
Rbt
-
4.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Brake pads (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.83% fail on Brake discs
-
0.83% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.83% fail on Lever
-
4.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 6.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.7% fail on
Seats
- 1.7% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.83% fail on
Transmission
-
0.83% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.83% fail on Joints
-
0.83% fail on
Prop shafts
-
0.83% fail on
Body
- 0.83% fail on Other body component
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp
-
2.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.83% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.83% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.83% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.83% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.83% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.83% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.83% fail on Electrical wiring
-
9.9% fail on
Suspension
- 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
-
2.5% fail on
Springs
-
1.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.7% fail on Coil spring
-
0.83% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.83% fail on Attachment bracket
-
1.7% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.83% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.83% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.83% fail on Pins and bushes
-
8.3% fail on
Visibility
- 4.1% fail on Washers
- 3.3% fail on Wipers
-
0.83% fail on
View to rear
- 0.83% fail on Mirrors
-
4.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.7% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.83% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.83% fail on Other leaks
-
2.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.5% fail on
Steering
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.83% fail on Ball joint
- 0.83% fail on Drag link end
-
0.83% fail on
Power steering
- 0.83% fail on Operation
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.83% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.83% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.83% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.83% fail on Condition
-
0.83% fail on
Seat belts