MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Land Cruiser Colorado » 2002

Toyota Land Cruiser Colorado MOT Results

Registered in 2002
55.7% pass rate
from 192 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser Colorado is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 5.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.6% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.52% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension rods (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.0% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.52% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.52% fail on Axles
      • 0.52% fail on Axle
    • 0.52% fail on Springs
      • 0.52% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.7% fail on Chassis (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Chassis condition (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.1% fail on Transmission
      • 1.6% fail on Prop shafts (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Joints (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.52% fail on Joints
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.52% fail on Towbar
      • 0.52% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.52% fail on Doors
      • 0.52% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.52% fail on Catch
    • 0.52% fail on Seats
      • 0.52% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.52% fail on Cabs
      • 0.52% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.52% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Pivot (275 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Cable
      • 0.52% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.52% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.52% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.6% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Pedal
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.52% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.52% fail on Lever
    • 0.52% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.52% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.52% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.52% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 5.2% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.52% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.52% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.52% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.52% fail on Washers
  • 3.6% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.1% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.52% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.52% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages