MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Land Cruiser Colorado » 2000

Toyota Land Cruiser Colorado MOT Results

Registered in 2000
55.9% pass rate
from 143 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser Colorado is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.4% fail on Decelerometer (41 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (44 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.70% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.70% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 6.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Lever
        • 0.70% fail on Clevis joint
        • 0.70% fail on Pivot
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.5% fail on Parking brake control (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Lever (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.70% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.70% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.70% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.70% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.70% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 9.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 5.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Suspension arm (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (20 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.1% fail on Springs
      • 2.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.70% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.70% fail on Axles
      • 0.70% fail on Axle
    • 0.70% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.70% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.70% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.70% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.70% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.70% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.2% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.8% fail on Towbar (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Vehicle structure (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 0.70% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.70% fail on Panel
    • 0.70% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.70% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.70% fail on Transmission
      • 0.70% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.70% fail on Joints
    • 0.70% fail on Seats
      • 0.70% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.70% fail on Cabs
      • 0.70% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Washers
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
  • 4.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.70% fail on Requirements
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.2% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested (20 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.70% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.70% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.5% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.70% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages