Toyota Land Cruiser Colorado MOT Results

Registered in 1998
60.8% pass rate
from 148 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser Colorado is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 8.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 6.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (18 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.4% fail on Springs
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension rods (11 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.68% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 9.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.68% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.68% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.68% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
    • 6.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.68% fail on Cable
        • 0.68% fail on Linkage
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.4% fail on Lever
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.68% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.68% fail on Pedal
    • 0.68% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.68% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.68% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.68% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Horn
      • 0.68% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.68% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Chassis
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
      • 0.68% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.68% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Towbar (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.68% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.68% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.68% fail on Pipe
    • 0.68% fail on Body
      • 0.68% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.68% fail on Seats
      • 0.68% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.68% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.68% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.68% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.68% fail on Washers
  • 6.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.1% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.68% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.68% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.68% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.4% fail on Steering
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.68% fail on Other components
        • 0.68% fail on Steering component
    • 2.0% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.68% fail on Power steering
      • 0.68% fail on Operation
    • 0.68% fail on Steering play
      • 0.68% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.68% fail on Condition
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages