Toyota Land Cruiser Amazon MOT Results
Registered in 200369.8% pass rate
from 126 tests in 2021
(31% better than other 2003 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser Amazon is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 2.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
- 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
-
1.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 0.79% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
4.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 4.0% fail on Brake pads
-
4.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.4% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.79% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.79% fail on Hand lever
-
0.79% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.79% fail on Lever
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Suspension
-
5.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Linkage
-
4.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.2% fail on Ball joint
- 0.79% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.79% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.79% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.79% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.79% fail on Operation
-
5.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
9.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.79% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.79% fail on Headlamp
- 0.79% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.79% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.79% fail on Battery(ies)
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
8.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.6% fail on
Transmission
-
1.6% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.6% fail on Joints
-
1.6% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.79% fail on
Chassis
- 0.79% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.79% fail on
Cabs
- 0.79% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
4.8% fail on
Tyres
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 2.4% fail on Tread depth
-
3.2% fail on
Steering
-
1.6% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.6% fail on Steering rack
-
0.79% fail on
Power steering
- 0.79% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.79% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.79% fail on
Steering play
- 0.79% fail on Steering rack
-
1.6% fail on
Steering gear
-
3.2% fail on
Visibility
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
-
0.79% fail on
View to rear
- 0.79% fail on Mirrors
-
3.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.79% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.79% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Compression ignition
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.79% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.79% fail on Prescribed areas