Toyota Land Cruiser Amazon MOT Results

Registered in 2002
71.5% pass rate
from 144 tests in 2020
(41% better than other 2002 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser Amazon is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.1% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.69% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.69% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.69% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.69% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.69% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 6.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.69% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.69% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.69% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.69% fail on Lever
  • 7.6% fail on Suspension (58% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.69% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.69% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.69% fail on Springs
      • 0.69% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.69% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.69% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.69% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 7.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Transmission
      • 2.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.8% fail on Joints
    • 0.69% fail on Chassis
      • 0.69% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.69% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.69% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.69% fail on Pipe
  • 2.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.1% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.69% fail on Power steering
      • 0.69% fail on Other components
    • 0.69% fail on Steering column
  • 2.8% fail on Visibility (67% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.69% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.69% fail on Washers
  • 2.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (74% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.69% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.69% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas

Search Good Garages