Toyota Land Cruiser Amazon MOT Results

Registered in 2000
48.7% pass rate
from 117 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser Amazon is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Battery
    • 2.6% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.7% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.85% fail on Attachment
    • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.85% fail on Attachment
    • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.7% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.85% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.85% fail on Attachment
    • 0.85% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.85% fail on Front
    • 0.85% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.85% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.85% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.85% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.85% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.8% fail on Components
        • 6.0% fail on Pipes
        • 0.85% fail on Hoses
    • 5.1% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.85% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.85% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.85% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
      • 0.85% fail on Operation
    • 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.85% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 6.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 6.0% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 6.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.85% fail on Emissions
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.85% fail on Cap
    • 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
  • 4.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.85% fail on Condition
      • 0.85% fail on Attachment
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Size/type
    • 0.85% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.7% fail on Towbars (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Towbar
    • 0.85% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.85% fail on Steering
    • 0.85% fail on Steering system
      • 0.85% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.85% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.85% fail on Attachment
  • 0.85% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages