Toyota Land Cruiser Amazon MOT Results

Registered in 1999
65.5% pass rate
from 110 tests in 2020
(18% better than other 1999 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser Amazon is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (92% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 2.7% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (20 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (56% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (9.6% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (24% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (3.5% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (22% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.91% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (29% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.91% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (46% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Hand lever (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (24% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.91% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.91% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.91% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (24% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (32% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.91% fail on Lever
    • 0.91% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.91% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.91% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (15% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp (14% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps (30% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp (25% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Electrical equipment (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.91% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.91% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (1.3% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Chassis (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Chassis condition (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Transmission (11% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Drive shafts (5.2% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Joints (36% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Drive shaft
    • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (16% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (18% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.91% fail on Towbar
      • 0.91% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.91% fail on Body
      • 0.91% fail on Panel
    • 0.91% fail on Cabs
      • 0.91% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.1% fail on Suspension (41% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (40% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint (33% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (28% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage
    • 1.8% fail on Springs (10% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.91% fail on Mounting
      • 0.91% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.91% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.91% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.91% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 3.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (13% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts (3.5% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas (19% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Condition
    • 0.91% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (54% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (52% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Spark ignition (61% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (50% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.91% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.91% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.91% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.7% fail on Visibility (64% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.91% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.91% fail on Wipers
    • 0.91% fail on Washers
  • 0.91% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.91% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.91% fail on Attachment
  • 0.91% fail on Tyres
    • 0.91% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages