Toyota iQ MOT Results

Registered in 2010
82.8% pass rate
from 3,421 tests in 2017
(41% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota iQ is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.47% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.088% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.029% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.6% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front lamps (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Headlamps (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Stop lamp (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.029% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.15% fail on Horn
    • 0.088% fail on Battery
    • 0.088% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Fog lamp (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.029% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 3.7% fail on Brakes (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.058% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.029% fail on Brake linings
    • 0.91% fail on Hydraulic systems (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Components (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Pipes (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Leaks
    • 0.91% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Rear wheels (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Front wheels (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.029% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.029% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.029% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.088% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.029% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.029% fail on Pedal
        • 0.029% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.029% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.029% fail on Lever
    • 0.029% fail on ABS
    • 0.029% fail on Locking devices
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.058% fail on Size/type
  • 0.53% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.26% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.26% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.058% fail on Requirements
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment
  • 0.47% fail on Suspension (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.088% fail on Suspension arms (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Wheel bearings (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Front
      • 0.029% fail on Rear
    • 0.058% fail on Shock absorbers (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Condition (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Drive shafts (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Front drive shafts (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.058% fail on Constant velocity joints (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.029% fail on Location
    • 0.029% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.029% fail on Condition
  • 0.44% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.44% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.029% fail on Condition
  • 0.18% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.12% fail on Body condition
    • 0.029% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.029% fail on Chassis
    • 0.029% fail on Seats
      • 0.029% fail on Passengers
  • 0.18% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Emissions
    • 0.058% fail on Exhaust system (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Emissions not tested
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota iQ (2008 - 2014)
    Triumph of 4-seater packaging that still earned 5 NCAP stars. Most models 99g/km so VED free. Better to drive than a Smart or a Fiat 500.

    Search Good Garages