Toyota iQ MOT Results
Registered in 200981.9% pass rate
from 5,862 tests in 2017
(45% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota iQ is unusually good or bad.
-
6.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(24% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Wipers (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Washers
- 0.26% fail on Windscreen
- 0.068% fail on Mirrors
-
5.6% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
(55% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Matched pair
-
1.1% fail on
Position lamps
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Front lamps (67% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Rear lamps (92% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Registration plate lamp (80% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Stop lamp (78% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Horn
-
0.22% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (62% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.22% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.051% fail on Battery
-
5.1% fail on
Brakes
(21% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Hub components
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.32% fail on Brake discs (47% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Components
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Hoses
- 0.051% fail on Leaks
- 0.017% fail on Operation
-
1.7% fail on
Components
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake performance
(61% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Rear wheels (40% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Front wheels (81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Brake imbalance (75% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.017% fail on Brake operation
- 0.20% fail on Electronic stability system (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.034% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.034% fail on
Pedal
- 0.017% fail on Condition
- 0.017% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.034% fail on
Pedal
- 0.034% fail on ABS (87% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Hub components
-
2.9% fail on
Tyres
(59% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth (58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Valve stem
-
0.92% fail on
Suspension
(91% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(88% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (88% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.15% fail on
Shock absorbers
(87% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Condition (97% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Suspension arms
(94% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (95% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Attachment
-
0.10% fail on
Drive shafts
(91% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Front drive shafts
(91% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Constant velocity joints (92% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.10% fail on
Front drive shafts
(91% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.085% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.085% fail on Condition
-
0.085% fail on
Wheel bearings
(82% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Rear
-
0.017% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.017% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.31% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(88% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.77% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.70% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.068% fail on
Seat belts
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Exhaust system (83% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Emissions (71% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.017% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.017% fail on Cap
-
0.34% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.34% fail on Registration plate
-
0.19% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Body condition
- 0.034% fail on Body security
-
0.034% fail on
Seats
- 0.017% fail on Passengers
- 0.017% fail on Drivers
-
0.017% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.017% fail on Chassis
-
0.12% fail on
Road Wheels
(65% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
-
0.017% fail on
Steering
- 0.017% fail on Steering operation
Read the Honest John Review
-
Toyota iQ (2008 - 2014)
Triumph of 4-seater packaging that still earned 5 NCAP stars. Most models 99g/km so VED free. Better to drive than a Smart or a Fiat 500.