MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » iQ » 2009

Toyota iQ MOT Results

Registered in 2009
75.4% pass rate
from 6,448 tests in 2021
(38% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota iQ is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (46% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (40% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Direction indicators (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Flashing type (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.047% fail on Individual direction indicators (96% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.25% fail on Horn
      • 0.11% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.047% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.062% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.062% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.031% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.031% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.031% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Rear fog lamp (95% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Rear fog lamp (95% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.016% fail on Switch
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Washers (24% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on View to rear
      • 0.078% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.031% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.031% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.016% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.5% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.85% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.85% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.016% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.016% fail on Cable
    • 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (51% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (49% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (89% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance (70% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.093% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on Rbt (89% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.093% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.45% fail on Electronic stability control (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Anti-lock braking system (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.062% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.031% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.016% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.016% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.062% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.031% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Pedal
    • 0.031% fail on Parking brake control (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Lever (91% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.016% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 4.0% fail on Suspension (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage ball joints (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.016% fail on Linkage
    • 1.0% fail on Springs (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Coil springs (82% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Coil spring (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Suspension arms (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.016% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.016% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (49% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth (43% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Size/type
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition (46% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (45% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Catalyst emissions (52% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.031% fail on Compression ignition (98% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.016% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.016% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.093% fail on Fluid leaks (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.031% fail on Engine oil leaks (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Exhaust system (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Transmission (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Drive shafts (92% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Joints (91% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.016% fail on Pipe
    • 0.047% fail on Chassis
      • 0.047% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.047% fail on Body
      • 0.031% fail on Other body component
      • 0.016% fail on Panel
    • 0.031% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.031% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.031% fail on Doors (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition
      • 0.016% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition
    • 0.031% fail on Seats
      • 0.016% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.016% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.016% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.016% fail on Bracket
    • 0.016% fail on Undertray
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Seat belts (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment
    • 0.016% fail on Airbags
      • 0.016% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.25% fail on Identification of the vehicle (47% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plates (46% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment
  • 0.12% fail on Steering (95% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Steering linkage components (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.031% fail on Steering play
      • 0.031% fail on Steering rack
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota iQ (2008 - 2014)
    Triumph of 4-seater packaging that still earned 5 NCAP stars. Most models 99g/km so VED free. Better to drive than a Smart or a Fiat 500.

    Search Good Garages