Toyota Corolla MOT Results

Registered in 2009
65.5% pass rate
from 1,625 tests in 2021
(17% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Corolla is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (54% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.062% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.92% fail on Electrical equipment (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Horn
      • 0.062% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.25% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp (81% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 7.1% fail on Brakes
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.062% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.062% fail on Lever
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance (75% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (74% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance (79% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt
          • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.062% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.062% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.062% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.18% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.062% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.74% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.74% fail on Lever
    • 0.62% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.55% fail on Hand lever (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
    • 0.25% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.062% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.062% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.062% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.062% fail on Operation
    • 0.062% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.062% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.062% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (73% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on View to rear
      • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.18% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.062% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.062% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition (41% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.55% fail on Catalyst emissions (59% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.25% fail on Noise suppression (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Undertray (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.062% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.1% fail on Suspension (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joints (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.80% fail on Suspension arms (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.62% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.55% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.31% fail on Springs (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Axles
      • 0.25% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.062% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 2.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (39% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Tank (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.74% fail on Transmission (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Drive shafts (60% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Joints (59% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Exhaust system (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Spare wheel (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel condition (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Carrier
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.062% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.062% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.062% fail on Towbar
      • 0.062% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.062% fail on Doors
      • 0.062% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.062% fail on Door condition
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.92% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.92% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.80% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.74% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.68% fail on Attachment
    • 0.062% fail on Condition
  • 0.62% fail on Steering (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Steering linkage components (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Track rod end (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.062% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.062% fail on Power steering
      • 0.062% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.12% fail on Seat belt installation check (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.062% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.062% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.062% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages