Toyota Corolla MOT Results

Registered in 1995
59.6% pass rate
from 364 tests in 2020
(11% worse than other 1995 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Corolla is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension (24% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers (47% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Suspension arms (83% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.27% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.27% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (21% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Transmission (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Prop shafts (43% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Joints (91% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system (13% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis (11% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition (11% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (42% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (41% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system (60% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Body (77% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Panel (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Other body component
    • 0.27% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (18% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim (47% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim (47% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp (19% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators (35% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type (35% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (6.5% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (12% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Headlamps (80% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp (79% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Electrical equipment (66% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.27% fail on Horn
    • 0.27% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Position lamp
  • 11% fail on Brakes (2.9% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Brake performance (1.8% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (77% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (84% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (37% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (13% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (18% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (56% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (21% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake performance not tested (47% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Parking brake performance (44% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Rbt (42% better than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.55% fail on Parking brake performance (32% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4.6% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (24% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Brake linings and pads (21% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Brake pads (21% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Hydraulic systems (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake control (56% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Lever (56% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.27% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.27% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.27% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.27% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.27% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 7.4% fail on Visibility (10% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers (45% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers (38% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.27% fail on Window
  • 6.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (6.4% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (2.6% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Spark ignition (1.2% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (8.4% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Emission control equipment (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Oxygen sensor
          • 0.27% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.55% fail on Emissions not tested (49% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.82% fail on Compression ignition (12% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.27% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Condition (81% worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 3.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (17% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Seat belts (37% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas (63% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Requirements
  • 0.55% fail on Steering (87% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Steering linkage components (78% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.27% fail on Locking devices

Search Good Garages