Toyota Celica MOT Results

Registered in 2005
57.7% pass rate
from 2,009 tests in 2020
(10% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.050% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.70% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.60% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.45% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.100% fail on Horn
      • 0.050% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.55% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.55% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.55% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Direction indicators (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Flashing type (85% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.050% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.050% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.050% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.050% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Brakes (19% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Brake performance (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (67% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (67% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.050% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 3.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.050% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.050% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.050% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.050% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.050% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.100% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Pedal (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Lever (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (55% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Anti-lock braking system (58% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.100% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.050% fail on Servos
      • 0.050% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.050% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.25% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.20% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 9.0% fail on Suspension (49% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Springs
      • 4.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.2% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (34% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.100% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.100% fail on Linkage
      • 0.100% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.75% fail on Shock absorbers (51% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Wheel bearings (67% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (63% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Suspension arms (94% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (93% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Ball joint dust cover (89% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.25% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.25% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.100% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.100% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Size/type
  • 7.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.8% fail on Spark ignition (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (40% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.00% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.40% fail on Compression ignition (77% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.100% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.050% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.050% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.100% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.050% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.20% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.050% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 5.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (29% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.55% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Tank
      • 0.25% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Hose
      • 0.050% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.55% fail on Seats (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Passenger's seat (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.50% fail on Transmission (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Drive shafts (86% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Joints (85% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.15% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.100% fail on Undertray
    • 0.050% fail on Chassis
      • 0.050% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.050% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.050% fail on Body
      • 0.050% fail on Other body component
    • 0.050% fail on Doors
      • 0.050% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.050% fail on Door condition
    • 0.050% fail on Floor
    • 0.050% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.050% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.050% fail on Cabs
      • 0.050% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility (28% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (65% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.050% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.050% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.050% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.050% fail on View to rear
      • 0.050% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (60% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Seat belts (54% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.050% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (64% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Airbags
      • 0.050% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.70% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Steering linkage components (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.050% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.15% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.050% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.050% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.050% fail on Steering play
      • 0.050% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.65% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.55% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 0.050% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.050% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages