Toyota Celica MOT Results

Registered in 2005
62.0% pass rate
from 1,922 tests in 2017
(16% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.3% fail on Front lamps (27% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Rear lamps (77% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp (32% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Battery
    • 0.26% fail on Direction indicators (91% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Flashing type (91% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters (78% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Individual lamps (95% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.052% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.052% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.052% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.052% fail on Horn
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.0% fail on Front wheels (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (44% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.16% fail on Brake back plates (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.8% fail on Components
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.26% fail on Hoses (67% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.52% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Leaks
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.47% fail on Service brake control components (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Pedal (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on ABS (71% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.052% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.052% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 7.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Size/type
    • 0.21% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.6% fail on Suspension (65% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Coil springs (41% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (41% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Location
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Attachment
      • 0.052% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.57% fail on Wheel bearings (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Front
      • 0.052% fail on Rear
    • 0.31% fail on Front suspension joints (75% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Drive shafts (91% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Front drive shafts (91% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Constant velocity joints (91% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Component mounting (85% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.052% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.052% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.052% fail on Condition
    • 0.052% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 6.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.10% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.7% fail on Emissions (80% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.88% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.21% fail on Cap
  • 1.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (51% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.78% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 0.68% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.42% fail on Attachment
    • 0.26% fail on Condition
  • 0.68% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.57% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Steering system (91% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.052% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.052% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.36% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (73% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Passengers
    • 0.10% fail on Body condition (79% better than other 2005 cars)

Search Good Garages