Toyota Celica MOT Results
Registered in 200258.1% pass rate
from 2,806 tests in 2017
(16% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (23% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
7.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.6% fail on Front lamps
- 0.64% fail on Rear lamps (68% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.071% fail on All position lamps
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp
- 5.1% fail on Stop lamp (20% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Battery
-
0.89% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(42% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Fog lamp (42% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Tell tale
-
0.50% fail on
Direction indicators
(81% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Side repeaters (63% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Individual lamps (90% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.036% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.50% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Horn (57% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.036% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.036% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.036% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.036% fail on Lamp
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
7.7% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.5% fail on Front wheels
- 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance (44% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.7% fail on
Hub components
(44% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Brake pads (57% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Brake discs
- 0.25% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.071% fail on Brake linings
- 0.071% fail on Brake back plates
-
3.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(47% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Components
(48% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Pipes (37% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Hoses (77% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.036% fail on Cylinders
- 0.18% fail on Operation
- 0.071% fail on Leaks (80% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Components
(48% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Parking brake
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.46% fail on ABS (58% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.21% fail on
Pedal
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Pedal
- 0.21% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.11% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.071% fail on Locking devices (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.3% fail on
Tyres
- 5.3% fail on Tread depth
- 4.2% fail on Condition
- 0.36% fail on Size/type
- 0.14% fail on Valve stem
-
8.4% fail on
Suspension
(61% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(44% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (34% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (56% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Linkage condition (85% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Coil springs
(54% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Location
-
0.93% fail on
Wheel bearings
(49% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Front
- 0.21% fail on Rear (80% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Prescribed areas
(71% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Component mounting (70% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Subframe mounting (72% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.89% fail on Condition
-
0.53% fail on
Suspension arms
(89% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (89% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Attachment
-
0.43% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.43% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Drive shafts
(92% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Front drive shafts
(92% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Constant velocity joints (92% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Front drive shafts
(92% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Front suspension joints (91% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.036% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.036% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.036% fail on Condition
- 0.036% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
3.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(44% better than other 2002 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.3% fail on Washers (38% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Windscreen
- 0.071% fail on Mirrors (83% better than other 2002 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.7% fail on Emissions (37% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (55% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Fuel system
(56% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Tank
- 0.11% fail on Pipe
- 0.036% fail on Cap
- 0.036% fail on System
-
1.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(62% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Body condition (55% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.25% fail on Chassis
-
0.18% fail on
Seats
- 0.14% fail on Passengers
- 0.036% fail on Drivers
-
0.11% fail on
Doors
(85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Passengers front
- 0.036% fail on Drivers
- 0.036% fail on Body security
-
1.00% fail on
Road Wheels
(120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Attachment (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
1.00% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(76% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Seat belts
(63% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas (64% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
0.071% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(96% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.071% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (96% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Seat belts
(63% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Steering
(83% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Power steering
- 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.14% fail on Operation
- 0.071% fail on Other components
-
0.29% fail on
Steering system
(93% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Steering rack (92% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Locking devices
-
0.036% fail on
Steering control
- 0.036% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.36% fail on
Power steering
-
0.50% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(56% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Registration plate (56% better than other 2002 cars)