Toyota Celica MOT Results

Registered in 1999
58.1% pass rate
from 627 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Brakes (27% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (52% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.32% fail on Plate brake tester (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (70% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.16% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
    • 3.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.64% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.64% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.32% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Switch
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Horn
      • 0.80% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.32% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.64% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.32% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 3.0% fail on Shock absorbers (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.48% fail on Suspension arms (90% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.48% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.32% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.32% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (39% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (46% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition (56% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 10% fail on Catalyst emissions (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.80% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.16% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.16% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.16% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.48% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.48% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 8.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.4% fail on Joints
        • 0.16% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.96% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.96% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.96% fail on Chassis
      • 0.96% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.64% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.48% fail on Tank
      • 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.32% fail on Seats
      • 0.32% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Towbar
      • 0.16% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility (35% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.32% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (59% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.80% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.48% fail on Steering (88% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Steering linkage components (81% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages