Toyota Celica MOT Results

Registered in 1996
56.4% pass rate
from 699 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.0% fail on Front lamps (81% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Rear lamps (75% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Battery (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.7% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.72% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (47% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (61% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators (63% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type (63% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.29% fail on Individual lamps (82% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.14% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 18% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (66% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 14% fail on Emissions (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.86% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Cap
      • 0.14% fail on System
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (36% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Front wheels (100% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Rear wheels (68% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.43% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (44% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Components (51% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Pipes (49% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Hoses
        • 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.57% fail on Operation
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.43% fail on Brake back plates (10 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.7% fail on ABS
    • 0.57% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.57% fail on Condition
    • 0.57% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.57% fail on Pedal
        • 0.57% fail on Condition
    • 0.57% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.14% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.14% fail on Cable
  • 15% fail on Suspension (22% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Front drive shafts (110% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 7.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.14% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.43% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas (60% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Component mounting (55% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms (67% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (64% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.43% fail on Front
      • 0.43% fail on Rear
    • 0.29% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.14% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
    • 0.29% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.57% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
      • 0.14% fail on Installation check
        • 0.14% fail on Anchorage's
  • 1.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (66% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition (60% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Vehicle structure (83% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Chassis (83% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Passengers
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers
    • 0.14% fail on Load security
      • 0.14% fail on Bootlid
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.86% fail on Steering (82% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Power steering
      • 0.29% fail on Pump (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.29% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.14% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.72% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.72% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages