Toyota Celica MOT Results
Registered in 199555.6% pass rate
from 178 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(180% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
21% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
21% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 19% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested
-
21% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.56% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
21% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(61% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(130% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Rbt
(140% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.2% fail on
Rbt
(140% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 4.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.56% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.56% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
5.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.56% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 0.56% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(130% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
0.56% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.56% fail on Lever
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.8% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
6.7% fail on
Transmission
(180% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.56% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.56% fail on Joints
-
6.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.7% fail on
Cabs
(8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.56% fail on
Chassis
- 0.56% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.56% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.56% fail on Pipe
-
0.56% fail on
Body
- 0.56% fail on Body condition
-
0.56% fail on
Doors
-
0.56% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.56% fail on Door condition
-
0.56% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
6.7% fail on
Transmission
(180% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.56% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.56% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.56% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.56% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.56% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.56% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.56% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.56% fail on Switch
-
9.6% fail on
Suspension
- 4.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.56% fail on Ball joint
- 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.56% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.56% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
4.5% fail on
Visibility
- 2.8% fail on Washers
- 1.7% fail on Wipers
-
2.8% fail on
Tyres
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 2.2% fail on Registration plates
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.1% fail on
Steering
-
0.56% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.56% fail on Steering rack
-
0.56% fail on
Power steering
- 0.56% fail on Operation
-
0.56% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.56% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.56% fail on Attachment