Toyota Celica MOT Results

Registered in 1995
60.1% pass rate
from 511 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 18% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 17% fail on Spark ignition (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 15% fail on Catalyst emissions (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.59% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.39% fail on NOx sensor (88 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.59% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.39% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.59% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.20% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.20% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.20% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.20% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.39% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.39% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.20% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.20% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.59% fail on Switch
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.59% fail on Horn
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.98% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.78% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.39% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.20% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.20% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 8.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (99% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt
          • 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 3.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (89% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Brake drums (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.20% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.20% fail on Lever
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
      • 0.20% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.39% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.20% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.20% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.20% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 9.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission
      • 3.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.9% fail on Joints
      • 0.39% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.39% fail on Joints
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.98% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.59% fail on Pipe
      • 0.20% fail on Tank
      • 0.20% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.59% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.59% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.59% fail on Chassis
      • 0.59% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.39% fail on Body
      • 0.39% fail on Other body component
    • 0.20% fail on Cabs
      • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.6% fail on Suspension
    • 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.20% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.98% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.78% fail on Springs
      • 0.78% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.78% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.59% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 6.5% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.20% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.20% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.20% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 2.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
  • 2.3% fail on Steering
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.59% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.39% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.78% fail on Power steering
      • 0.59% fail on Other components
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
    • 0.20% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.20% fail on Steering box
    • 0.20% fail on Steering wheel
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages