Toyota Celica MOT Results

Registered in 1995
53.1% pass rate
from 559 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (26% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Position lamps (72% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Front lamps (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (81% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.8% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.72% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.36% fail on Switch
    • 2.9% fail on Battery
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.18% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.3% fail on Horn
    • 0.36% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.18% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.18% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.18% fail on Lamp
  • 18% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (63% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 13% fail on Emissions (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.54% fail on Pipe
      • 0.36% fail on Cap
      • 0.18% fail on Tank
      • 0.18% fail on System
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Couplings
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.54% fail on Attachment
    • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas (55% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.18% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.72% fail on Front
      • 0.36% fail on Rear
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.72% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
    • 0.72% fail on Suspension arms (74% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.36% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.36% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.6% fail on Front wheels (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.89% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.18% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.0% fail on Components
        • 2.7% fail on Pipes
        • 0.72% fail on Hoses
      • 0.36% fail on Leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.54% fail on Brake back plates (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Brake calipers (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.72% fail on ABS
    • 0.54% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.36% fail on Pedal
        • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.18% fail on Cable
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Washers (67% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.54% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
    • 0.18% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (46% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
  • 2.1% fail on Steering (56% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering system (73% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.36% fail on Track rod end (79% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.89% fail on Power steering
      • 0.54% fail on Other components
      • 0.36% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Drive system
    • 0.36% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (65% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Body condition
    • 0.36% fail on Vehicle structure (80% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Chassis (80% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Body security
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.89% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.72% fail on Attachment
    • 0.18% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages