Toyota Celica MOT Results

Registered in 1991
64.7% pass rate
from 190 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1991 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.53% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.53% fail on Switch
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.53% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.53% fail on Horn
    • 1.1% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.53% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 0.53% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.53% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.53% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.53% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.53% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.53% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.53% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 9.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.7% fail on Transmission
      • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.53% fail on Hose
      • 0.53% fail on Pipe
    • 0.53% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.53% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.53% fail on Seats
      • 0.53% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 8.9% fail on Brakes
    • 6.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.53% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.53% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.53% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.53% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.53% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 7.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.53% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.8% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 4.7% fail on Steering rack (150% worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering
      • 1.1% fail on Pump (15 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
  • 4.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.53% fail on Condition
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.53% fail on Condition
  • 2.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.53% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.53% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.53% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages