Toyota Celica MOT Results
Registered in 199067.1% pass rate
from 79 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.1% fail on
Rbt
- 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.1% fail on
Rbt
-
3.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.5% fail on Brake performance not tested (6 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
-
5.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(12 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (12 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.5% fail on
Chassis
- 2.5% fail on Chassis condition
-
2.5% fail on
Fuel system
- 2.5% fail on Tank (21 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Transmission
-
2.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.5% fail on Joints
-
2.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
8.9% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.3% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.3% fail on Switch
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
8.9% fail on
Suspension
- 3.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.3% fail on
Springs
-
1.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.3% fail on Mounting
-
1.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.3% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 1.3% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
1.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
7.6% fail on
Visibility
- 5.1% fail on Wipers
- 2.5% fail on Washers
-
7.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.5% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.3% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.1% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates
-
1.3% fail on
Steering
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.3% fail on
Tyres
- 1.3% fail on Condition