MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Carina » 1996

Toyota Carina MOT Results

Registered in 1996
58.2% pass rate
from 349 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Carina is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (98% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 16% fail on Exhaust emissions (110% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 15% fail on Spark ignition (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 12% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.57% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.57% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.57% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.57% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.57% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.57% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.29% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.29% fail on Horn
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.29% fail on Switch
    • 0.29% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.29% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Joints
      • 0.57% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.57% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.86% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.29% fail on Pipe
    • 0.86% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.86% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.86% fail on Chassis
      • 0.86% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.57% fail on Doors
      • 0.57% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.57% fail on Door condition
    • 0.29% fail on Towbar
      • 0.29% fail on Coupling
    • 0.29% fail on Body
      • 0.29% fail on Panel
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 5.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt
          • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.86% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.57% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.29% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.86% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.86% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.86% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.29% fail on Brake discs
  • 10% fail on Suspension
    • 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.29% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.29% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 9.5% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.86% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
    • 2.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.29% fail on Steering box
    • 0.86% fail on Power steering
      • 0.57% fail on Other components
      • 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (67% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages