Toyota Carina E MOT Results
Registered in 199756.6% pass rate
from 341 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Carina E is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(68% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 14% fail on Emissions (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.59% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.29% fail on Pipe
- 0.29% fail on Cap
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
8.8% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.3% fail on Front wheels
- 4.4% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.88% fail on Service brake performance
-
7.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
7.3% fail on
Components
- 5.9% fail on Pipes
- 1.5% fail on Hoses
- 1.2% fail on Leaks
-
7.3% fail on
Components
- 1.5% fail on ABS
-
1.2% fail on
Hub components
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
8.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
7.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(150% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.59% fail on Attachment
- 0.59% fail on Linkage condition
-
3.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
3.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
(64% better than other 1997 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Component mounting
-
1.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.8% fail on Front
- 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.59% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.59% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.29% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
7.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(150% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(40% better than other 1997 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.4% fail on Front lamps
- 0.29% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.5% fail on Battery
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Fog lamp
-
0.88% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.88% fail on Headlamp
-
4.7% fail on
Position lamps
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(62% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Tread depth
- 5.3% fail on Condition
- 0.59% fail on Size/type
-
10.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.6% fail on Wipers
- 4.4% fail on Washers
- 0.29% fail on Windscreen
-
2.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(59% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
(62% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Prescribed areas (78% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Requirements
- 0.29% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
-
0.59% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.59% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
(62% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Steering
(80% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Steering system
(76% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Steering arm (10 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Steering system
(76% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(82% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Body condition
-
0.29% fail on
Doors
- 0.29% fail on Passengers other
-
0.59% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.59% fail on Registration plate
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment