Toyota Camry MOT Results

Registered in 1998
54.2% pass rate
from 142 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Camry is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (14 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 5.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.70% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 9.9% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Drive shafts (200% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 9.9% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.70% fail on Seats
      • 0.70% fail on Driver's seat
  • 15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (76% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 14% fail on Exhaust emissions (78% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 14% fail on Spark ignition (95% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 11% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.70% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.70% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.70% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.70% fail on Switch
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.70% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.70% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.70% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt
          • 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.70% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.70% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.70% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.70% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.4% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.70% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.70% fail on Lever
    • 0.70% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 7.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.70% fail on Condition
  • 0.70% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.70% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.70% fail on Steering
    • 0.70% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.70% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.70% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.70% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.70% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages