Toyota C-HR MOT Results

Registered in 2017

88.4% pass rate

from 13,911 tests in 2021

(10% better than other 2017 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota C-HR is unusually good or bad.

5.3% fail on Visibility (43% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Wipers (63% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Washers
- 0.050% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.043% fail on Windscreen
  - 0.0072% fail on Window
- 0.022% fail on Bonnet
- 0.022% fail on View to rear
  - 0.014% fail on Mirrors
  - 0.0072% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.0072% fail on Driver's view
2.5% fail on Tyres (26% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (33% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.022% fail on Size/type
2.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 1.3% fail on Headlamps (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Headlamp (200% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.029% fail on Dipswitch (12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.0072% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.82% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.65% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.24% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.23% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.014% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.14% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.058% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.058% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.058% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.043% fail on Horn
  - 0.014% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.029% fail on Stop lamp (91% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0072% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
  - 0.0072% fail on Main beam tell-tale
1.1% fail on Brakes (47% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Mechanical brake components (33% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.84% fail on Brake linings and pads (32% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.84% fail on Brake pads (32% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.24% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.24% fail on Brake discs
- 0.14% fail on Brake performance (72% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.079% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.079% fail on Rbt (72% better than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.050% fail on Service brake performance (78% better than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.029% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.022% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.022% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.0072% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.022% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (83% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.022% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.014% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.029% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.014% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.0072% fail on Electronic braking system
  - 0.0072% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.0072% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.0072% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.0072% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.0072% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
0.26% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.26% fail on Registration plates
0.16% fail on Suspension (82% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Anti-roll bars (57% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.036% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.0072% fail on Linkage
- 0.050% fail on Suspension arms (78% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.022% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.014% fail on Suspension arm
  - 0.0072% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.0072% fail on Ball joint
- 0.029% fail on Springs (92% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.029% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.029% fail on Coil spring (91% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.0072% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.0072% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.0072% fail on Ball joint
0.10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (82% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Exhaust emissions (82% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.086% fail on Spark ignition (72% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.079% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (60% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.0072% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.0072% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.0072% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.0072% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.0072% fail on Engine oil leaks
0.058% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (76% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Seat belts (67% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.043% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.014% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (86% better than other 2017 cars)
0.029% fail on Body, chassis, structure (91% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Body
  - 0.014% fail on Other body component
  - 0.0072% fail on Panel
- 0.0072% fail on Transmission
  - 0.0072% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.0072% fail on Joints
0.022% fail on Road Wheels (87% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Condition
- 0.0072% fail on Attachment
0.014% fail on Steering (90% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0072% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.0072% fail on Track rod end
- 0.0072% fail on Electronic power steering