Toyota Aygo MOT Results

Registered in 2016
89.8% pass rate
from 23,254 tests in 2020
(23% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Aygo is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.0% fail on Visibility
    • 1.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (34% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.052% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.052% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.0043% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.7% fail on Brakes (35% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (35% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (15% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (15% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0086% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.70% fail on Brake discs and drums (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Brake discs (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.013% fail on Lever
    • 0.55% fail on Brake performance (30% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (58% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (51% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance (56% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.069% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.0043% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.030% fail on Plate brake tester (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.030% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.013% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.069% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.039% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.030% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0043% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0043% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.056% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.056% fail on Rbt
          • 0.052% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0043% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.0086% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.12% fail on Lever
    • 0.10% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.082% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.022% fail on Pedal
    • 0.099% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0086% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.030% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.013% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0086% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0043% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.0043% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0043% fail on Servos
    • 0.0043% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 2.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (34% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0086% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.36% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.27% fail on Headlamps (46% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp (35% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Direction indicators (39% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Flashing type (39% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (50% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.013% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.0043% fail on Switch
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (49% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.0043% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.026% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (83% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Rear fog lamp (85% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0043% fail on Switch
    • 0.022% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.022% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.017% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.0043% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.0043% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres (44% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (27% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.073% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.047% fail on Size/type
  • 0.23% fail on Suspension (62% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.034% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.034% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0043% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.0043% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.030% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.017% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0043% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0043% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0043% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0086% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0086% fail on Sub-frame (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0043% fail on Springs
      • 0.0043% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.0043% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.0043% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0043% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.0043% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0043% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Attachment (81% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.17% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (57% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Exhaust emissions (58% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.034% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.0043% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.0043% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.017% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.017% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (60% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Transmission
      • 0.039% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.034% fail on Joints
        • 0.0043% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.0043% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0043% fail on Joints
    • 0.026% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.022% fail on Body
      • 0.0086% fail on Panel
      • 0.0086% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0043% fail on Body condition
    • 0.0086% fail on Exhaust system (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0086% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0086% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.0043% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0043% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0043% fail on Seats
      • 0.0043% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.11% fail on Identification of the vehicle (55% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Registration plates (60% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Vehicle Identification Number (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.056% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (78% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.039% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (56% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Seat belts (87% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Condition (92% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0043% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0043% fail on Attachment
  • 0.026% fail on Steering (80% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Steering linkage components (86% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0086% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.0086% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0043% fail on Electronic power steering
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages