Toyota Aygo MOT Results
Registered in 201687.4% pass rate
from 22,337 tests in 2021
(25% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Aygo is unusually good or bad.
-
4.3% fail on
Visibility
(9.4% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Wipers (15% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Washers
-
0.085% fail on
View to rear
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Mirrors (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0045% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.058% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.054% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0045% fail on Window
- 0.0045% fail on Driver's view
- 0.0045% fail on Bonnet
-
3.3% fail on
Brakes
(19% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(17% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.0045% fail on Brake linings
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0090% fail on Cable
- 0.0045% fail on Lever
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.87% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.60% fail on
Service brake performance
(46% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
(46% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (47% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.013% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0090% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.0045% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
(46% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.098% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.098% fail on
Rbt
- 0.085% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.013% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.098% fail on
Rbt
-
0.076% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.076% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.072% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.0090% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.076% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.022% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.60% fail on
Service brake performance
(46% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Parking brake control
(56% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Lever (85% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(91% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.10% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.098% fail on Hand lever (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0045% fail on Pedal
-
0.018% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0090% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.0045% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.0045% fail on Valves
-
0.018% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.0090% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0090% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.013% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.0090% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(17% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Tyres
(32% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth (20% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Size/type
-
2.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(42% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(20% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (20% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.35% fail on
Headlamps
(52% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp (47% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0045% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.34% fail on Stop lamp (45% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Direction indicators
(41% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Flashing type
(41% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Side repeaters (43% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.0045% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.21% fail on
Flashing type
(41% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (69% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.027% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.022% fail on
Electrical equipment
(67% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Horn
- 0.0045% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0045% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.018% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(90% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(90% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Rear fog lamp (90% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(90% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0090% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.0090% fail on Position lamp
-
0.0045% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.0045% fail on Switch
- 0.0045% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.0045% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.0045% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(20% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Suspension
(76% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.10% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.013% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0045% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.0045% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0045% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.13% fail on
Suspension arms
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Pins and bushes (67% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Ball joint (89% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.013% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.063% fail on Shock absorbers (55% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Springs
(99% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0090% fail on
Coil springs
(99% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0090% fail on Coil spring (99% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0045% fail on
Bonded suspension units
- 0.0045% fail on Attachment bracket
-
0.0090% fail on
Coil springs
(99% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0090% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0045% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0045% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.0045% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0045% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.20% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
0.26% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(69% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Spark ignition
(52% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (34% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Catalyst emissions (84% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.0045% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.23% fail on
Spark ignition
(52% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.036% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.0045% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
0.23% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(66% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
Transmission
(73% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Joints (73% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0045% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.058% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Bumpers
- 0.022% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.022% fail on
Body
- 0.018% fail on Other body component
- 0.0045% fail on Body condition
-
0.018% fail on
Doors
-
0.0090% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.0090% fail on Door condition
-
0.0090% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.0090% fail on Door condition
-
0.0090% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.013% fail on
Seats
- 0.0090% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.0045% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.0090% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.0090% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.0045% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
0.0045% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.0045% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.0045% fail on
Sub-frame
-
0.0045% fail on
Chassis
- 0.0045% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.0045% fail on
Load security
-
0.0045% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.0045% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.0045% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.058% fail on
Transmission
(73% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
(41% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Condition (89% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Attachment (87% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.081% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(62% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Registration plates (62% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.054% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(81% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.036% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Seat belts
(89% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Steering
(88% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Steering linkage components
(92% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0045% fail on Steering arm
-
0.0090% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.0090% fail on Steering rack
-
0.0045% fail on
Steering play
- 0.0045% fail on Steering rack
-
0.018% fail on
Steering linkage components
(92% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0045% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0045% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review
-
Toyota Aygo (2014 - 2022)
Plenty of kit as standard. Quirky looks. Very reliable.