Toyota Aygo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
72.4% pass rate
from 12,091 tests in 2017
(15% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Aygo is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (19% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (12% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (17% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (19% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Position lamps (32% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Front lamps (29% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Rear lamps (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0083% fail on Switch
    • 0.85% fail on Headlamps (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Headlamp (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0083% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.0083% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.66% fail on Hazard warning (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Switch (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Lamp (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Tell tale (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Direction indicators (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.083% fail on Individual lamps (90% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.066% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp (40% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Fog lamp (41% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.12% fail on Battery
    • 0.11% fail on Horn (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (68% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 9.6% fail on Brakes (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Brake imbalance (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.066% fail on Brake operation (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components (20% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (31% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Brake discs (32% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Wheel cylinder (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.0083% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.066% fail on Hoses
        • 0.025% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.041% fail on Leaks
      • 0.0083% fail on Operation
    • 0.45% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on ABS (59% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Service brake control components (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Pedal (82% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.017% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.017% fail on Cable
  • 5.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.099% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.017% fail on Bonnet (84% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres (23% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition (30% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.041% fail on Size/type (73% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 2.4% fail on Suspension (78% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Condition
      • 0.017% fail on Attachment
    • 0.66% fail on Wheel bearings (42% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Rear (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Front
    • 0.17% fail on Anti-roll bars (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Linkage condition (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Front drive shafts (85% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Constant velocity joints (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Front suspension joints (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.091% fail on Condition
    • 0.066% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Location
      • 0.017% fail on Condition (100% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.025% fail on Condition
    • 0.025% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.017% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.017% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.0083% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0083% fail on Component mounting
  • 1.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.88% fail on Emissions (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.050% fail on Fuel system (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Cap
      • 0.0083% fail on System
  • 0.46% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.41% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.38% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.025% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.058% fail on Seat belts (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.017% fail on Condition (93% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0083% fail on Attachment
  • 0.41% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Condition (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Attachment (66% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.15% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (66% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Body condition
    • 0.041% fail on Doors (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.0083% fail on Drivers
    • 0.025% fail on Body security
  • 0.14% fail on Steering (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Steering system (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0083% fail on Free play
        • 0.0083% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0083% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.058% fail on Power steering
      • 0.058% fail on Electronic power steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.0083% fail on Steering operation
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages