MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Aygo » 2009

Toyota Aygo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
64.6% pass rate
from 13,443 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Aygo is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Brakes (73% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 9.0% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 8.6% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.067% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.037% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.030% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.0074% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.037% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.015% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.015% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0074% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0074% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0074% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested (88% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (23% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (36% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (36% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.060% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.045% fail on Lever
        • 0.0074% fail on Cable
        • 0.0074% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.36% fail on Lever
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.18% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.060% fail on Pedal
    • 0.22% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Anti-lock braking system (59% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.052% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.030% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.030% fail on Hydraulic systems (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.015% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0074% fail on Other components
      • 0.0074% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.0074% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.0074% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0074% fail on Leaks
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (14% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (19% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (15% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Headlamp levelling device (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (27% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (27% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Switch (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators (73% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0074% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.0074% fail on Switch
    • 0.71% fail on Hazard warning (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.23% fail on Horn
      • 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.022% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0074% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.38% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (43% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp (43% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp (44% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0074% fail on Switch
    • 0.16% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.089% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.089% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.022% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.015% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.015% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 6.6% fail on Suspension (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (43% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Suspension arm (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Anti-roll bars (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.067% fail on Linkage (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Linkage ball joints (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0074% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0074% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0074% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0074% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.42% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.29% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0074% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.36% fail on Macpherson strut (90% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0074% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.23% fail on Springs (96% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Coil spring (98% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Mounting
      • 0.067% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Other suspension component (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0074% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.015% fail on Axles (93% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (92% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0074% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0074% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 5.0% fail on Visibility (16% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (49% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on View to rear
      • 0.082% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.015% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.037% fail on Bonnet (76% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Condition of glass (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Windscreen (78% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0074% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres (21% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Size/type (63% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 3.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (20% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Transmission (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Drive shafts (78% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Joints (78% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0074% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.0074% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0074% fail on Joints
    • 0.30% fail on Integral vehicle structure (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.030% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.25% fail on Bumpers (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Fuel system (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0074% fail on Tank
      • 0.0074% fail on Pipe
    • 0.067% fail on Body
      • 0.045% fail on Other body component
      • 0.015% fail on Panel
      • 0.0074% fail on Body condition
    • 0.030% fail on Doors (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Other passenger's door (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Door condition (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0074% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.0074% fail on Bracket
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (27% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (24% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Spark ignition (13% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Emissions not tested (84% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (46% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.015% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.015% fail on Oxygen sensor
      • 0.10% fail on Compression ignition (93% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.030% fail on Emissions not tested (77% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (97% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0074% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.0074% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.045% fail on Fluid leaks (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Engine oil leaks (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.0074% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.87% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.44% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0074% fail on Attachment
    • 0.41% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (29% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Airbags
      • 0.030% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.0074% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment (62% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.31% fail on Steering (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0074% fail on Other components
        • 0.0074% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.067% fail on Steering gear (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Steering rack (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0074% fail on Operation
    • 0.045% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.015% fail on Power steering (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Operation
    • 0.0074% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0074% fail on Steering rack
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages