Toyota Aygo MOT Results
Registered in 200859.8% pass rate
from 12,810 tests in 2021
(4.1% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Aygo is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Brakes
(55% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Service brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Plate brake tester
(180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.023% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.023% fail on Service brake performance
-
8.4% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.0078% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.0078% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
(54% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
(52% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (52% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.055% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.070% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.047% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.016% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.0078% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.016% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0078% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.0078% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
(52% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.023% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.023% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.5% fail on
Service brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(13% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(25% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads (25% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Brake linings
-
1.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
- 0.016% fail on Brake drums
-
0.10% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.055% fail on Cable
- 0.023% fail on Lever
- 0.0078% fail on Rod
- 0.0078% fail on Linkage
- 0.0078% fail on Pivot
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(25% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Parking brake control
(37% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Lever (59% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.30% fail on Hand lever
- 0.031% fail on Pedal (80% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(75% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system (70% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.086% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.055% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.023% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (82% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
-
0.078% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.055% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.0078% fail on Servos
- 0.0078% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.0078% fail on Valves
- 0.062% fail on Flexible brake hoses (63% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.016% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.016% fail on Other braking system component
- 0.0078% fail on Other components
-
0.016% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.5% fail on Stop lamp (19% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (53% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamps
(38% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp (37% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Headlamp levelling device (63% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Dipswitch
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(36% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(36% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Switch (24 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.46% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Individual direction indicators (76% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (83% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(36% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Electrical equipment
(39% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Horn (83% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.016% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0078% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.41% fail on
Hazard warning
(11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Switch (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(47% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(47% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp (47% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(47% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.078% fail on Position lamp
- 0.016% fail on All position lamps
-
0.031% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.023% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.0078% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.0078% fail on Rear reflectors
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(31% better than other 2008 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(32% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.85% fail on Ball joint (58% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover (36% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.047% fail on Suspension arm (78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.078% fail on Linkage (66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Linkage ball joints (97% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.023% fail on Ball joint (94% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (98% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0078% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.41% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.22% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.20% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (85% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Ball joint
-
0.37% fail on
Macpherson strut
(69% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.023% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers (76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Springs
(97% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Coil spring (98% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Mounting
- 0.031% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.16% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Other suspension component
(56% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Ball joint (69% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0078% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.023% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0078% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.0078% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0078% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.016% fail on
Axles
(92% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Axle
- 0.0078% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
5.5% fail on
Visibility
(13% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Wipers (22% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
View to rear
- 0.11% fail on Mirrors
- 0.070% fail on Bonnet (66% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.062% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0078% fail on Window
- 0.023% fail on Driver's view
-
5.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(13% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (22% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.031% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.55% fail on
Transmission
(80% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.039% fail on
Prop shafts
(68% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Joints
-
0.51% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Chassis
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Bumpers (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Doors
(49% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.17% fail on Door condition
-
0.023% fail on
Front passenger's door
(81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Door condition (81% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.18% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.023% fail on Tank
- 0.0078% fail on Pipe
-
0.086% fail on
Body
- 0.039% fail on Panel
- 0.039% fail on Other body component
- 0.0078% fail on Body condition
-
0.055% fail on
Cabs
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Floor
-
0.0078% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.0078% fail on Bracket
-
0.0078% fail on
Seats
- 0.0078% fail on Passenger's seat
-
5.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(43% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (85% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (18% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Emissions not tested (79% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.0078% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0078% fail on NOx sensor
-
0.28% fail on
Compression ignition
(82% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (93% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (92% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.031% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (93% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.0078% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(43% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Fluid leaks
(89% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Engine oil leaks (92% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.0078% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
5.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.1% fail on
Tyres
(22% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition (41% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Size/type (56% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(25% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(72% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Condition (37% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Requirements
- 0.62% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.047% fail on
Airbags
- 0.047% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(72% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.56% fail on Registration plates
-
0.46% fail on
Steering
(83% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Ball joint (71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Electronic power steering (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Steering gear
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Steering rack (84% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Power steering
(74% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Operation
- 0.0078% fail on Other components
-
0.023% fail on
Steering play
- 0.023% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0078% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.0078% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.21% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Road Wheels
(43% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Attachment (57% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Toyota Aygo (2005 - 2014)
Low road tax and insurance. Averages a claimed 60mpg. Cheap to run and drives decently. 99g/km CO2 from 2012.