MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Aygo » 2005

Toyota Aygo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
52.2% pass rate
from 1,940 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Aygo is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Headlamps (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Headlamp (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Switch (100 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.57% fail on Individual direction indicators (68% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Hazard warning (29 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Switch (29 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Horn (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.052% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.41% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.41% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.21% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (80% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 15% fail on Brakes (16% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (45% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 6.9% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (81% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.052% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.26% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.46% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.67% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (54% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.57% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.46% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.10% fail on Pedal
    • 0.31% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.31% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.052% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.052% fail on Valves
    • 0.15% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.052% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 14% fail on Suspension (20% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms (43% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (38% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint (65% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings (83% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (69% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (94% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.052% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.052% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.98% fail on Sub-frames (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Sub-frame (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.26% fail on Springs (94% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Mounting
      • 0.052% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.052% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.052% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.052% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.052% fail on Other suspension component
  • 9.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Strengthening plate (49 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.052% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Transmission (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Drive shafts (77% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Joints (77% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints
    • 0.57% fail on Bumpers (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.21% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.15% fail on Body
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component
      • 0.052% fail on Panel
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.15% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
    • 0.15% fail on Cabs (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Bracket
  • 8.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (27% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Spark ignition (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.41% fail on Compression ignition (71% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.052% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.052% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.052% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.052% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.9% fail on Visibility
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.052% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.052% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.052% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.052% fail on View to rear
      • 0.052% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (42% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Size/type
  • 3.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.62% fail on Steering (84% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Steering linkage components (87% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.21% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.052% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.052% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment
  • 0.052% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.052% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages