Toyota Avensis MOT Results

Registered in 2016
87.6% pass rate
from 4,220 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Avensis is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.071% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (83% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.31% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.071% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.14% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.095% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.047% fail on Hazard warning (22 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Switch (22 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.047% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.047% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.047% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.024% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.024% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.024% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.024% fail on Horn
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (41% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes (44% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (69% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (75% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads (75% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.31% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.31% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.21% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.024% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.024% fail on Rbt
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.024% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.024% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.024% fail on Rbt
          • 0.024% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.17% fail on Electronic parking brake (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.024% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.047% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.024% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.024% fail on Pedal
    • 0.024% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.024% fail on Leaks
    • 0.024% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.024% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 1.8% fail on Visibility (36% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Wipers (46% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Washers
    • 0.047% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.024% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.024% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.024% fail on View to rear
      • 0.024% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.40% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.38% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.26% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.12% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.095% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.024% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.024% fail on Oxygen sensor
    • 0.024% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.024% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 0.26% fail on Suspension (58% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.047% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.047% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.024% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.19% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.071% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.047% fail on Condition
      • 0.024% fail on Requirements
  • 0.14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.071% fail on Body
      • 0.071% fail on Other body component
    • 0.024% fail on Transmission
      • 0.024% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.024% fail on Joints
    • 0.024% fail on Seats
      • 0.024% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.024% fail on Undertray
  • 0.071% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.047% fail on Attachment
    • 0.024% fail on Condition
  • 0.047% fail on Identification of the vehicle (80% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Registration plates (80% better than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages