MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Avensis » 2016

Toyota Avensis MOT Results

Registered in 2016
86.2% pass rate
from 3,827 tests in 2021
(17% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Avensis is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (29% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.89% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.39% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.078% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.026% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Stop lamp (88% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.052% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.052% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.052% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.052% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Size/type
  • 2.8% fail on Brakes
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.50% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.37% fail on Brake performance (50% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.052% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.026% fail on Rbt
          • 0.026% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.026% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.026% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.026% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.26% fail on Parking brake control (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Electronic parking brake (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.078% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.026% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.026% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.078% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.078% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.026% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.026% fail on Pedal
    • 0.026% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 2.4% fail on Visibility (41% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers (48% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Washers
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.052% fail on View to rear
      • 0.052% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.94% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.89% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.63% fail on Compression ignition (84% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.078% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.26% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.026% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.078% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.052% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.026% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.026% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.026% fail on Undertray
  • 0.89% fail on Suspension (57% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.078% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.078% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.026% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.10% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.10% fail on Springs (91% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Coil springs (91% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Coil spring (91% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.10% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint dust cover (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.078% fail on Suspension rods (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.052% fail on Axles
      • 0.052% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.026% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.026% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 0.34% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.18% fail on Transmission
      • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
      • 0.052% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.052% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.052% fail on Body
      • 0.026% fail on Panel
      • 0.026% fail on Other body component
    • 0.026% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.026% fail on Tank
    • 0.026% fail on Doors
      • 0.026% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.026% fail on Door condition
    • 0.026% fail on Seats
      • 0.026% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.24% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 0.18% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.026% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.13% fail on Steering
    • 0.13% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.10% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.026% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.078% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.078% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages