Toyota Avensis MOT Results

Registered in 2010
75.6% pass rate
from 7,242 tests in 2017
(16% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Avensis is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (12% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (89% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Front lamps (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Rear lamps (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on All direction indicators
      • 0.014% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.014% fail on Tell tales
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.028% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.014% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.014% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.21% fail on Stop lamp (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Battery
    • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Fog lamp (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.055% fail on Horn (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.014% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.014% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 5.6% fail on Brakes
    • 3.9% fail on Hub components (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Brake pads (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.28% fail on Brake calipers (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance (39% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Rear wheels (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.18% fail on Front wheels (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.097% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.069% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.35% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.19% fail on Components (54% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Pipes (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.083% fail on Hoses
        • 0.014% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.014% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.15% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.29% fail on Electronic parking brake (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Electronic stability system (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on ABS
    • 0.083% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.041% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.014% fail on Cable
      • 0.014% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.014% fail on Pivot
    • 0.014% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.014% fail on Pedal
        • 0.014% fail on Anti-slip
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
    • 0.069% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (23% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Bonnet (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.1% fail on Suspension (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Suspension arms (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Attachment
      • 0.014% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Anti-roll bars (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.30% fail on Drive shafts (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Front drive shafts (59% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Constant velocity joints (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Couplings
    • 0.29% fail on Coil springs (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Front
      • 0.014% fail on Rear
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.083% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.014% fail on Condition
    • 0.097% fail on Front suspension joints (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.041% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.041% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.028% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment
    • 0.014% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.014% fail on Condition
    • 0.014% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment
    • 0.014% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.014% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.014% fail on Component mounting
  • 1.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Drivers airbag (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Seat belts (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Requirements
  • 0.62% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.62% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.37% fail on Steering (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Steering system (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.014% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
        • 0.014% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.097% fail on Locking devices (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.28% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.23% fail on Body condition (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Doors
      • 0.014% fail on Drivers
      • 0.014% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.014% fail on Seats
      • 0.014% fail on Passengers
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
  • 0.12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.055% fail on Exhaust system (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Fuel system (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on System
    • 0.028% fail on Emissions (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Emissions not tested
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Avensis (2009 - 2015)
    Hugely practical and robust, refined and quiet on the move, excellent diesel engines, especially the 2.0 D-4D, very reliable.

    Search Good Garages