Toyota Auris MOT Results

Registered in 2016

84.0% pass rate

from 15,823 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Auris is unusually good or bad.

6.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (82% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (25% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (24% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.088% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Headlamps (34% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.95% fail on Headlamp (47% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.025% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.31% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.31% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.10% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.038% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.025% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.025% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.025% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.013% fail on Horn
  - 0.0063% fail on Electrical wiring
  - 0.0063% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.019% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.013% fail on Position lamp
  - 0.0063% fail on All position lamps
- 0.0063% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.0063% fail on Switch
4.5% fail on Visibility (13% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Wipers (36% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Washers (46% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.025% fail on Windscreen
- 0.025% fail on View to rear
  - 0.025% fail on Mirrors
3.3% fail on Tyres (16% better than other 2016 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Size/type
2.3% fail on Brakes (19% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (27% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (25% better than other 2016 cars)
    - 1.2% fail on Brake pads (25% better than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.0063% fail on Brake linings
  - 0.37% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.37% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.051% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.032% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.013% fail on Cable
    - 0.0063% fail on Pivot
- 0.75% fail on Brake performance
  - 0.37% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.36% fail on Rbt
      - 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.025% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.0063% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.0063% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 0.30% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.20% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      - 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      - 0.013% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      - 0.013% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 0.088% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.088% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.063% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.038% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.019% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.11% fail on Lever
- 0.070% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.063% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.0063% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.063% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.063% fail on Hand lever
- 0.025% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.019% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (77% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.019% fail on Electronic stability control
  - 0.0063% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.013% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.0063% fail on Reservoirs
  - 0.0063% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.0063% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.0063% fail on Leaks
0.98% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Suspension arms (55% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.088% fail on Pins and bushes (64% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.088% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.044% fail on Ball joint (77% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.013% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.013% fail on Linkage
  - 0.013% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joints (84% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.0063% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.051% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.025% fail on Suspension rods (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.013% fail on Ball joint (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.013% fail on Springs (99% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.013% fail on Coil springs (99% better than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.013% fail on Coil spring (99% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.013% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.013% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0063% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.0063% fail on Sub-frame
0.27% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (68% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Exhaust emissions (69% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.20% fail on Spark ignition (58% better than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (40% better than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.0063% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.0063% fail on Catalytic converter
      - 0.0063% fail on Oxygen sensor
    - 0.0063% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.0063% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.051% fail on Compression ignition (85% better than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.025% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    - 0.025% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (90% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Noise suppression
  - 0.013% fail on Undertray
- 0.013% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.013% fail on Engine oil leaks
0.18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (66% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Bumpers
- 0.051% fail on Body
  - 0.044% fail on Other body component
  - 0.0063% fail on Panel
- 0.032% fail on Transmission (85% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.025% fail on Drive shafts (87% better than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.025% fail on Joints (87% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.0063% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.0063% fail on Joints
- 0.025% fail on Undertray
- 0.013% fail on Chassis (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.013% fail on Chassis condition (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0063% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.0063% fail on Seats
  - 0.0063% fail on Driver's seat
0.095% fail on Steering (65% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Steering linkage components (57% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.082% fail on Track rod end (60% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.013% fail on Ball joint
0.088% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (69% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Seat belts (73% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.044% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.044% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (63% better than other 2016 cars)
0.082% fail on Road Wheels (56% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Attachment
0.070% fail on Identification of the vehicle (67% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Registration plates (67% better than other 2016 cars)
0.0063% fail on Seat belt installation check
- 0.0063% fail on Anchorages