MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Auris » 2010

Toyota Auris MOT Results

Registered in 2010
69.3% pass rate
from 9,932 tests in 2021
(19% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Auris is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (9.2% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.081% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (22% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (18% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Headlamp levelling device (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Horn (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.010% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.091% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.060% fail on Reversing lamps (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Reversing lamps (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.030% fail on Switch
    • 0.020% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.020% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 7.8% fail on Brakes
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance (16% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.010% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (40% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.99% fail on Service brake performance (42% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance (46% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.010% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.010% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.99% fail on Rbt
          • 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.050% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.020% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.040% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.040% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.010% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.24% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (57% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp) (56% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.040% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.091% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.060% fail on Lever
        • 0.020% fail on Cable
        • 0.010% fail on Relay lever
    • 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Parking brake control (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Lever (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.010% fail on Pedal
    • 0.081% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Anti-lock braking system (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Electronic stability control (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.050% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.030% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.010% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.010% fail on Valves
    • 0.030% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.020% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.020% fail on Other components
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.010% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.091% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.040% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.040% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.020% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.7% fail on Suspension (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Springs (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (63% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Coil spring (63% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joints (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Ball joint (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Linkage (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.83% fail on Suspension arms (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Other suspension component (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.010% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.020% fail on Macpherson strut (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.020% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.010% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.020% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.010% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.010% fail on Sub-frame
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (28% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Size/type
  • 1.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Exhaust system (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Transmission (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.020% fail on Joints
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.081% fail on Tank
      • 0.020% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Pipe
    • 0.10% fail on Body
      • 0.070% fail on Other body component
      • 0.020% fail on Panel
      • 0.010% fail on Body condition
    • 0.020% fail on Seats
      • 0.020% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.020% fail on Undertray
    • 0.010% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.010% fail on Bracket
    • 0.010% fail on Doors
      • 0.010% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.010% fail on Door condition
    • 0.010% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.010% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Spark ignition (59% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (35% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Catalyst emissions (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Emissions not tested (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.18% fail on Compression ignition (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Emissions not tested (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.030% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.020% fail on Undertray
      • 0.010% fail on Sound deadening material
    • 0.030% fail on Fluid leaks (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.010% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.010% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.78% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.61% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Requirements
      • 0.010% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.020% fail on Airbags
      • 0.020% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.47% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.33% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Steering linkage components (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.020% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.010% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.010% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.010% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.010% fail on Operation
    • 0.010% fail on Power steering
      • 0.010% fail on Operation
    • 0.010% fail on Steering play
      • 0.010% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.010% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Auris (2007 - 2013)
    Decent combination of ride and handling that might suit some people better than a harder sprung Golf or a Civic. A few inches taller than a Golf of Focus so easier to get in and out.

    Search Good Garages