Toyota Auris MOT Results

Registered in 2010
76.3% pass rate
from 8,930 tests in 2017
(19% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Auris is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front lamps (34% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Tell tales (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Individual lamps (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Switch
        • 0.011% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Battery
    • 0.078% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Fog lamp (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.045% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.022% fail on Tell tale (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Lamp
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 0.011% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Rear wheels (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.022% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.011% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components (19% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads (22% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.078% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.011% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Components (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.011% fail on Hoses
      • 0.045% fail on Leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.011% fail on Operation
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.10% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Lever (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Cable
    • 0.022% fail on ABS (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 5.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.078% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition (17% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.045% fail on Size/type
  • 1.2% fail on Suspension (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Anti-roll bars (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Shock absorbers (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Suspension arms (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Rear
      • 0.011% fail on Front
    • 0.067% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Condition (98% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Drive shafts (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Front drive shafts (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Constant velocity joints (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Front suspension joints (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
      • 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 0.99% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (30% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.078% fail on Emissions (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.59% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.50% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.090% fail on Seat belts (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Requirements
      • 0.011% fail on Installation check
        • 0.011% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.45% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.20% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.18% fail on Body condition
    • 0.022% fail on Body security
  • 0.12% fail on Steering (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Steering system (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Steering rack (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Free play
        • 0.022% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.10% fail on Road Wheels (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Attachment (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Auris (2007 - 2013)
    Decent combination of ride and handling that might suit some people better than a harder sprung Golf or a Civic. A few inches taller than a Golf of Focus so easier to get in and out.

    Search Good Garages