Toyota Auris MOT Results

Registered in 2010
71.4% pass rate
from 10,293 tests in 2020
(18% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Auris is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Individual direction indicators (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Switch
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (17% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (17% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.097% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0097% fail on Switch
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps (29% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (26% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0097% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.86% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Reversing lamps (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Reversing lamps (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0097% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.029% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.029% fail on Switch
    • 0.019% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.0097% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0097% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 8.0% fail on Brakes (11% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0097% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.0097% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.019% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.019% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0097% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0097% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.049% fail on Plate brake tester (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.039% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0097% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0097% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0097% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance (60% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.029% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.029% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.18% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Cable
        • 0.019% fail on Linkage (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Pivot (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0097% fail on Relay lever
    • 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake control (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Lever
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.019% fail on Pedal (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0097% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.078% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Anti-lock braking system (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0097% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.039% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.039% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.019% fail on Flexible brake hoses (79% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.078% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.068% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.0097% fail on Window
    • 0.049% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Size/type
  • 2.6% fail on Suspension (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Springs (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Coil springs (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Coil spring (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Mounting
    • 0.69% fail on Anti-roll bars (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Linkage ball joints (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Ball joint (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0097% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Suspension arms (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Ball joint dust cover (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Ball joint (97% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Wheel bearings (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Other suspension component (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0097% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.029% fail on Macpherson strut (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0097% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.029% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.019% fail on Sub-frames (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0097% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.0097% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 1.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust system (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Bumpers (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0097% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.11% fail on Transmission (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Joints (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0097% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.087% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0097% fail on Body condition
      • 0.0097% fail on Panel
    • 0.029% fail on Undertray
    • 0.019% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.019% fail on Bracket
    • 0.0097% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0097% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0097% fail on Doors
      • 0.0097% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0097% fail on Door condition
  • 0.92% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.72% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Seat belts (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Requirements
    • 0.029% fail on Airbags
      • 0.029% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.71% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Exhaust emissions (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Spark ignition (68% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (51% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Catalyst emissions (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Emissions not tested (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Compression ignition (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0097% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.0097% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.029% fail on Fluid leaks (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Engine oil leaks (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0097% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.019% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.019% fail on Undertray
  • 0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.019% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.14% fail on Steering (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Steering linkage components (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0097% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0097% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.0097% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0097% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0097% fail on Universal joint
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Auris (2007 - 2013)
    Decent combination of ride and handling that might suit some people better than a harder sprung Golf or a Civic. A few inches taller than a Golf of Focus so easier to get in and out.

    Search Good Garages