Toyota Auris MOT Results

Registered in 2009
73.7% pass rate
from 11,059 tests in 2017
(20% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Auris is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (8.5% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Position lamps (44% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Rear lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Front lamps (25% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (51% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0090% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.0090% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.68% fail on Direction indicators (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Flashing type (56% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Individual lamps (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (68% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Tell tales (34 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.090% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.44% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.0090% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.13% fail on Battery
    • 0.11% fail on Horn (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.027% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.027% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.018% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0090% fail on Switch
  • 7.5% fail on Brakes (15% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear wheels (23% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Front wheels (27% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.054% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.0090% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.53% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.21% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0090% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.0090% fail on Hoses
      • 0.12% fail on Leaks
      • 0.018% fail on Operation
    • 0.42% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.063% fail on ABS (76% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.036% fail on Lever (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Cable
    • 0.018% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.0090% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.0090% fail on Pedal
        • 0.0090% fail on Condition
  • 6.1% fail on Driver's view of the road (16% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.0090% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
    • 0.0090% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 1.8% fail on Suspension (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Shock absorbers (33% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Condition (33% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (93% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Linkage condition (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (94% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Suspension arms (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0090% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Front drive shafts (90% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Constant velocity joints (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Front suspension joints (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Wheel bearings (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Rear (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Front (93% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.018% fail on Macpherson strut (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0090% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.0090% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.0090% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0090% fail on Subframe mounting
  • 0.96% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Exhaust system (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Emissions (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Fuel system (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Pipe
      • 0.018% fail on Hose
      • 0.018% fail on System
    • 0.036% fail on Emissions not tested (75% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.60% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.54% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.44% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.42% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.027% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0090% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0090% fail on Attachment
  • 0.18% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (59% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Body condition
    • 0.027% fail on Body security
    • 0.018% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.018% fail on Load security
      • 0.018% fail on Access panel
    • 0.0090% fail on Doors
      • 0.0090% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.0090% fail on Seats
      • 0.0090% fail on Drivers
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
  • 0.14% fail on Steering (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Steering system (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Track rod end (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0090% fail on Free play
        • 0.0090% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0090% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0090% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0090% fail on Other components
        • 0.0090% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.027% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.0090% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.0090% fail on Power steering
      • 0.0090% fail on Operation
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Auris (2007 - 2013)
    Decent combination of ride and handling that might suit some people better than a harder sprung Golf or a Civic. A few inches taller than a Golf of Focus so easier to get in and out.

    Search Good Garages