Toyota Auris MOT Results

Registered in 2009
68.2% pass rate
from 12,137 tests in 2020
(18% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Auris is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (7.3% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp (25% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (3.1% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (0.65% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (18% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (27% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (27% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device (12% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Direction indicators (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Flashing type (70% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (72% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.091% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on All direction indicators (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.0082% fail on Switch
    • 0.54% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (12% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp (14% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp (13% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on Switch
      • 0.0082% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.0082% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical equipment (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Horn (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Battery(ies) (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Reversing lamps (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Reversing lamps (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Position lamps (4.2% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Position lamp (3.4% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Switch
    • 0.025% fail on Hazard warning (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Switch (47% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (0.46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (23% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.0082% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.0082% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Brakes (18% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance (2.8% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (73% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.016% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (4.5% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.066% fail on Plate brake tester (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.033% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.0082% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.016% fail on Decelerometer (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.016% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (48% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (48% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.96% fail on Service brake performance (50% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance (47% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester (54% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (41% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0082% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.32% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (40% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (sp) (39% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance (44% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (3.7% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested (7.4% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (2.4% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (9.7% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads (9.4% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Brake linings (8.1% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (28% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (27% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Brake drums (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (24% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.058% fail on Cable (33% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Lever (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on Linkage
    • 0.31% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (30% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Hand lever (2.4% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Pedal (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake control (51% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Lever (44% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-lock braking system (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Electronic stability control (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Hydraulic systems (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Reservoirs (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Brake fluid (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Valves (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Flexible brake hoses (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0082% fail on Additional braking device
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility (14% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers (29% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Bonnet (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Driver's view (7.0% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on View to rear (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Mirrors (41% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Condition of glass (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Windscreen (72% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (39% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type (15% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 4.4% fail on Suspension (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (31% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6.1% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Linkage ball joints (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Anti-roll bar (23% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Linkage (93% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Springs (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.97% fail on Suspension arms (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Suspension arm (76% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Shock absorbers (42% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Other suspension component (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.041% fail on Sub-frames (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Sub-frame (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.0082% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.025% fail on Macpherson strut (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Macpherson strut (26% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Axles
      • 0.0082% fail on Axle
    • 0.0082% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0082% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0082% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition (39% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (9.9% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Catalyst emissions (56% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested (51% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0082% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.0082% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.35% fail on Compression ignition (75% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.066% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (86% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Emissions not tested (85% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.0082% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0082% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.033% fail on Fluid leaks (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Engine oil leaks (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.0082% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.016% fail on Noise suppression (41% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.0082% fail on Undertray
  • 1.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Exhaust system (47% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Bumpers (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Transmission (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Drive shafts (89% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Joints (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system (20% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Tank (74% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Hose (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Pipe (18% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.12% fail on Body (15% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component (53% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Integral vehicle structure (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Sub-frame (17% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Sub-frame condition (21% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.025% fail on Undertray (43% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Seats (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Driver's seat (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0082% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.0082% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0082% fail on Bracket
    • 0.0082% fail on Doors
      • 0.0082% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0082% fail on Door condition
    • 0.0082% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0082% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.65% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (29% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (15% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Seat belts (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Prescribed areas (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Requirements (44% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Airbags (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Drivers airbag (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.54% fail on Identification of the vehicle (20% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plates (21% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.40% fail on Steering (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Steering linkage components (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Locking devices (17% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Other components
        • 0.0082% fail on Steering component
    • 0.041% fail on Steering gear (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Steering play (36% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Steering rack (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0082% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment (10% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Hubs
  • 0.0082% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0082% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Auris (2007 - 2013)
    Decent combination of ride and handling that might suit some people better than a harder sprung Golf or a Civic. A few inches taller than a Golf of Focus so easier to get in and out.

    Search Good Garages