MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Auris » 2009

Toyota Auris MOT Results

Registered in 2009
67.1% pass rate
from 12,190 tests in 2021
(19% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Auris is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (6.2% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp (28% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (24% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp (22% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.93% fail on Direction indicators (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Flashing type (53% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Individual direction indicators (68% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters (59% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators (93% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.0082% fail on Switch
    • 0.58% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.016% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical equipment (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.041% fail on Horn (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.016% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0082% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.0082% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.0082% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0082% fail on Switch
  • 10% fail on Brakes (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (46% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance (62% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.0082% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.033% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.0082% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (42% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (43% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.074% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.041% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.016% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.37% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (39% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (sp) (41% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance (50% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (16% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.025% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.090% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Cable
        • 0.016% fail on Linkage
        • 0.0082% fail on Relay lever
        • 0.0082% fail on Pivot
    • 0.39% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake control (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Lever
      • 0.0082% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.18% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Anti-lock braking system (66% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.016% fail on Pedal (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.066% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.0082% fail on Valves
    • 0.025% fail on Flexible brake hoses (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.0082% fail on Condition
    • 0.0082% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0082% fail on Additional braking device
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility (11% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (21% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.0082% fail on Window
    • 0.016% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.4% fail on Suspension (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage ball joints (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0082% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0082% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Springs (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Coil springs (73% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Coil spring (73% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Mounting
      • 0.041% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Pins and bushes (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Suspension arm (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.57% fail on Shock absorbers (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Sub-frames (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Sub-frame (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0082% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.049% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.041% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0082% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.041% fail on Macpherson strut (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.041% fail on Other suspension component (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0082% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0082% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.033% fail on Axles (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Axle
    • 0.025% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (91% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth (32% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (43% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (40% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Spark ignition (20% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.72% fail on Catalyst emissions (47% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested (38% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.36% fail on Compression ignition (75% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (72% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (89% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.033% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.033% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.041% fail on Fluid leaks (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Engine oil leaks (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.025% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.025% fail on Undertray
  • 2.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Transmission (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts (87% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Joints (86% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.0082% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0082% fail on Joints
    • 0.23% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Tank (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Pipe
      • 0.016% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Hose
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.082% fail on Other body component
      • 0.033% fail on Panel
      • 0.0082% fail on Body condition
    • 0.041% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.033% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.0082% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.0082% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.033% fail on Undertray
    • 0.025% fail on Chassis
      • 0.025% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.016% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.016% fail on Bracket
    • 0.016% fail on Seats (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.0082% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.0082% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.0082% fail on Doors
      • 0.0082% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0082% fail on Door condition
  • 0.86% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.62% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Seat belts (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0082% fail on Requirements
    • 0.033% fail on Airbags
      • 0.033% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.60% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Steering linkage components (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Track rod end (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.016% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0082% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0082% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0082% fail on Other components
        • 0.0082% fail on Steering component
    • 0.041% fail on Steering gear (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Steering rack (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Operation
    • 0.0082% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0082% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.0082% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0082% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0082% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels (41% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0082% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Auris (2007 - 2013)
    Decent combination of ride and handling that might suit some people better than a harder sprung Golf or a Civic. A few inches taller than a Golf of Focus so easier to get in and out.

    Search Good Garages