Toyota Alphard MOT Results

Registered in 2002
70.4% pass rate
from 243 tests in 2017
(40% better than other 2002 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Alphard is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (28% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Tell tale (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Switch (43 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.41% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Headlamps (83% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.41% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.82% fail on Horn
    • 0.41% fail on Battery
    • 0.41% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.41% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.41% fail on All direction indicators
  • 9.9% fail on Suspension (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Trailing arms (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.82% fail on Suspension arms (83% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (82% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.41% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.41% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.41% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.41% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 7.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.3% fail on Windscreen (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.82% fail on Washers
    • 0.41% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.3% fail on Brakes (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components
      • 3.7% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance (86% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Rear wheels (79% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.41% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.41% fail on Components
        • 0.41% fail on Pipes
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (78% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 2.5% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering system
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.41% fail on Free play
        • 0.41% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.41% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (69% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (73% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.41% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.41% fail on Body condition
    • 0.41% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.41% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.41% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.41% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.41% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages