Talbot Express MOT Results
Registered in 199253.6% pass rate
from 1,155 tests in 2017
(19% worse than other 1992 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Talbot Express is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(52% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
11% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 11% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.17% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.17% fail on Switch
-
0.087% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.087% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
7.4% fail on
Position lamps
(70% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Front lamps (78% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.43% fail on All position lamps
- 0.087% fail on Switch
-
6.9% fail on
Direction indicators
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Flashing type
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Individual lamps (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Tell tales
- 0.35% fail on All direction indicators
-
6.9% fail on
Flashing type
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (95% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.5% fail on Battery (190% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.1% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.43% fail on Tell tale
- 0.35% fail on Switch
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.6% fail on Horn
-
0.78% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.43% fail on Switch
- 0.35% fail on Lamp
- 0.52% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.087% fail on Rear reflectors
-
11% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
22% fail on
Brakes
(50% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(65% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Rear wheels (92% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Front wheels
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.35% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.17% fail on Brake operation
- 0.087% fail on Gradient hand brake
-
10.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(96% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Components
(110% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Pipes (94% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Hoses (70% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Valves (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.087% fail on Servos
- 0.61% fail on Leaks
- 0.43% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.26% fail on Operation
-
9.2% fail on
Components
(110% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.78% fail on Condition
-
0.61% fail on
Hub components
(63% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Brake discs
- 0.087% fail on Brake pads
-
0.52% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Components
(10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Pump/compressors (22 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Hoses
- 0.087% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
0.43% fail on
Components
(10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
- 0.087% fail on Condition
- 0.087% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
-
0.17% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.17% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(65% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
7.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 5.0% fail on Component mounting
- 3.1% fail on Spring mounting (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Subframe mounting
-
7.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(180% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (180% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.17% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
-
6.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(180% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
(79% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rear (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Front
- 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.69% fail on
Shock absorbers
(61% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Condition (61% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Suspension arms
(70% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (72% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Attachment
-
0.43% fail on
Leaf springs
(4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Anchor bracket (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Condition
- 0.087% fail on Spring eye
-
0.087% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 0.087% fail on Shackle
-
0.26% fail on
Coil springs
(77% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Condition (74% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.087% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.087% fail on Attachment
-
7.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(34% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Emissions (47% better than other 1992 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.43% fail on Pipe
- 0.43% fail on System
- 0.35% fail on Cap
- 0.26% fail on Hose
- 0.087% fail on Tank
- 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested
-
9.9% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.5% fail on Wipers
- 5.0% fail on Washers
- 0.35% fail on Mirrors
- 0.26% fail on Bonnet
- 0.26% fail on Windscreen
-
5.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.5% fail on Body condition
-
1.3% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.3% fail on Chassis
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
- 0.69% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Passengers front
-
0.69% fail on
Seats
- 0.52% fail on Passengers
- 0.43% fail on Drivers
- 0.35% fail on Engine mountings (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Spare wheel (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Steering
-
3.6% fail on
Steering system
- 2.3% fail on Track rod end
- 1.5% fail on Steering rack
- 0.087% fail on Ball joint
-
0.35% fail on
Steering control
- 0.26% fail on Steering column
- 0.087% fail on Steering lock
- 0.17% fail on Locking devices
-
0.087% fail on
Power steering
- 0.087% fail on Operation
-
3.6% fail on
Steering system
-
3.9% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.26% fail on Condition
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 0.69% fail on Tread depth (68% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Size/type
- 0.087% fail on Valve stem
-
0.61% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.61% fail on Registration plate
- 0.087% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.17% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
0.087% fail on
Towbars
- 0.087% fail on Vehicle structure