Suzuki Wagon R MOT Results

Registered in 2005
59.9% pass rate
from 1,797 tests in 2021
(10% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Wagon R is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 8.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance (50% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (36% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (35% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (45% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.95% fail on Brake performance not tested (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (93% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.056% fail on Rbt
          • 0.056% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (37% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.78% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.72% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.056% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.39% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Anti-lock braking system (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.056% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.17% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.056% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.056% fail on Servos
    • 0.056% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.056% fail on Lever
  • 12% fail on Suspension (29% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.6% fail on Ball joint (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Springs (69% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Coil springs (69% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Coil spring (69% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (59% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.056% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.39% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.056% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers (87% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Axles
      • 0.056% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 9.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (43% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.39% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (67% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (44% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.17% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.056% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.17% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Position lamp
  • 8.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.9% fail on Transmission
      • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Joints
      • 0.22% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.22% fail on Joints
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.89% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on Tank
      • 0.28% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.056% fail on Hose
    • 0.50% fail on Doors
      • 0.45% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.45% fail on Door condition
      • 0.056% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.056% fail on Door condition
    • 0.45% fail on Chassis
      • 0.39% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.056% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (82% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.056% fail on Panel
      • 0.056% fail on Other body component
    • 0.056% fail on Seats
      • 0.056% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on View to rear
      • 0.39% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.056% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
  • 4.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.9% fail on Steering linkage components (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.28% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.056% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.056% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.39% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.056% fail on Operation
    • 0.33% fail on Steering play
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (39% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (42% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Spark ignition (29% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (40% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.056% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.056% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.61% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.56% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.056% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (92% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Requirements
    • 0.056% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages