Suzuki Wagon R MOT Results

Registered in 2005
63.2% pass rate
from 2,166 tests in 2017
(18% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Wagon R is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Suspension (31% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.60% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Wheel bearings (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Front
    • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts (44% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Front drive shafts (43% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (43% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Coil springs (71% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.88% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Condition (37 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment
    • 0.18% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Component mounting (80% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Anti-roll bars (98% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment
  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (46% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (32% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps (42% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Front lamps (36% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Rear lamps (69% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.23% fail on Side repeaters (68% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (54% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (66% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.046% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Fog lamp (65% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.14% fail on Battery (78% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Horn
    • 0.046% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.046% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 10% fail on Brakes (24% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Components (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Pipes (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.092% fail on Hoses (88% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.51% fail on Leaks
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (69% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Front wheels (45% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Rear wheels (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components (44% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (47% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.046% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.046% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.092% fail on Parking brake (89% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on ABS (90% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.046% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.046% fail on Pedal
        • 0.046% fail on Condition
  • 7.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (32% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.092% fail on Indirect vision devices (26 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres (29% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (53% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
    • 0.092% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.3% fail on Steering system
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack (70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Free play
        • 0.092% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.092% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.092% fail on Steering arm
  • 3.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (27% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.69% fail on Emissions (66% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Tank
      • 0.092% fail on Pipe
      • 0.092% fail on Cap
      • 0.046% fail on Hose
      • 0.046% fail on System
    • 0.092% fail on Emissions not tested (80% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 1.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.97% fail on Doors (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Passengers other (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.28% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers
      • 0.046% fail on Drivers
    • 0.18% fail on Body condition
    • 0.046% fail on Load security
      • 0.046% fail on Tailgate
  • 0.97% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (60% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.37% fail on Requirements (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
      • 0.092% fail on Installation check (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.092% fail on Anchorage's (57 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment
    • 0.18% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (87% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (93% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
      • 0.046% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.74% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.74% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages