Suzuki Wagon R MOT Results
Registered in 200559.9% pass rate
from 1,797 tests in 2021
(10% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Wagon R is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Brakes
- 8.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Brake performance
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake performance
(36% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
(35% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (45% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
(35% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.95% fail on Brake performance not tested (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(93% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.056% fail on
Rbt
- 0.056% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.056% fail on
Rbt
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake performance
(36% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(37% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
-
0.78% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.72% fail on Brake discs
- 0.056% fail on Brake drums
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.39% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(73% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Anti-lock braking system (72% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.28% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.28% fail on Pedal
-
0.17% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.056% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.17% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.056% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.056% fail on Servos
-
0.056% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.056% fail on Lever
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(29% better than other 2005 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.6% fail on Ball joint (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 3.4% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Springs
(69% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Coil springs
(69% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Coil spring (69% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Coil springs
(69% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (59% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(93% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.056% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.39% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint
- 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.056% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.17% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers (87% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Axles
- 0.056% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
7.3% fail on
Suspension arms
-
9.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(43% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.39% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (44% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(62% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(62% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(62% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.17% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.056% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.17% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.17% fail on Position lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
8.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.9% fail on
Transmission
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.7% fail on Joints
-
0.22% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.22% fail on Joints
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.89% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.33% fail on Tank
- 0.28% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.056% fail on Hose
-
0.50% fail on
Doors
-
0.45% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.45% fail on Door condition
-
0.056% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.056% fail on Door condition
-
0.45% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.45% fail on
Chassis
- 0.39% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.056% fail on Strengthening plate
- 0.17% fail on Bumpers
-
0.11% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (82% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Body
- 0.056% fail on Panel
- 0.056% fail on Other body component
-
0.056% fail on
Seats
- 0.056% fail on Passenger's seat
-
3.9% fail on
Transmission
-
6.4% fail on
Visibility
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.2% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
View to rear
- 0.39% fail on Mirrors
- 0.056% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.11% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.11% fail on Windscreen
-
6.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Condition
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Size/type
-
4.4% fail on
Steering
-
3.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(37% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Track rod end
- 0.28% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
- 0.056% fail on Steering arm
- 0.056% fail on Locking devices
-
0.39% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.33% fail on Steering rack
- 0.056% fail on Operation
-
0.33% fail on
Steering play
- 0.33% fail on Steering rack
-
3.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(37% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(39% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(42% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(29% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (40% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.056% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.056% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
3.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(29% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.56% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.056% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
3.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(42% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(52% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.1% fail on Condition (92% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas (72% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Requirements
- 0.056% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.50% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.50% fail on Registration plates
-
0.45% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.33% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Attachment