MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » Wagon R » 2002

Suzuki Wagon R MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.6% pass rate
from 1,931 tests in 2021
(9.9% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Wagon R is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes (46% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (72% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 7.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.2% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance (96% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.052% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.10% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.052% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.83% fail on Brake performance not tested (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (58% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (83% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs (77% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.052% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.36% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.31% fail on Cable
        • 0.052% fail on Linkage
    • 1.7% fail on Load sensing valves (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake control (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Lever (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.31% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.10% fail on Valves
      • 0.052% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.26% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.052% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.052% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.052% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.052% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.052% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 9.7% fail on Suspension arms (76% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Suspension arm (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (93% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Springs
      • 3.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.3% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.052% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.73% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.052% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.47% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.052% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.36% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.21% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.052% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.052% fail on Axles
      • 0.052% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp (30% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Headlamp levelling device (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.83% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.52% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.26% fail on Horn
      • 0.052% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.41% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.052% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.052% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.052% fail on Switch
    • 0.052% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.052% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 9.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.8% fail on Transmission (33% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Drive shafts (39% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Joints (40% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.67% fail on Doors
      • 0.31% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition
      • 0.26% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
        • 0.052% fail on Catch
      • 0.10% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
    • 0.41% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on Pipe
      • 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.052% fail on Tank
    • 0.36% fail on Integral vehicle structure (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.26% fail on Chassis
      • 0.26% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.052% fail on Towbar
      • 0.052% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.052% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.052% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.052% fail on Body
      • 0.052% fail on Other body component
    • 0.052% fail on Floor
    • 0.052% fail on Seats
      • 0.052% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.052% fail on Cabs
      • 0.052% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.6% fail on Spark ignition (27% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (81% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.26% fail on Non catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Compression ignition (70% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.052% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.052% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.052% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.57% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.52% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.052% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.47% fail on View to rear
      • 0.47% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.26% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.26% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.21% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.052% fail on Window
    • 0.052% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Condition (52% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 5.1% fail on Steering
    • 4.4% fail on Steering linkage components (51% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Track rod end (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.36% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Steering gear (66% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Steering rack (64% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.052% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.052% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (45% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts (41% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
    • 0.78% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (51% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.47% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Speedometer (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.052% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages