MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » Wagon R » 2000

Suzuki Wagon R MOT Results

Registered in 2000
52.2% pass rate
from 695 tests in 2021
(13% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Wagon R is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (71% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (94% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 9.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 7.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.58% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Load sensing valves (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.14% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.14% fail on Linkage
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Lever (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.29% fail on Valves (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.29% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
    • 0.29% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp (65% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.86% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.72% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.43% fail on Horn
      • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.29% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (79% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Position lamp
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms (91% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.9% fail on Springs
      • 2.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.7% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.14% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (45% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.86% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.72% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.72% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.43% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.29% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint (15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 9.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 4.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.43% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.43% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.29% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.9% fail on Joints
      • 0.14% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.14% fail on Joints
    • 0.86% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Pipe
      • 0.29% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
    • 0.72% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.72% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.58% fail on Chassis
      • 0.58% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.58% fail on Doors
      • 0.29% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition
      • 0.29% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition
    • 0.29% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.14% fail on Load security
      • 0.14% fail on Access panel
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres (51% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Condition (76% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.43% fail on Size/type
  • 4.2% fail on Steering
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.72% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.14% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.72% fail on Steering play (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.58% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.29% fail on Electronic power steering (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
      • 0.29% fail on Requirements
    • 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages