Suzuki Wagon R MOT Results
Registered in 199958.2% pass rate
from 79 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Wagon R is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
18% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
16% fail on
Spark ignition
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 14% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
16% fail on
Spark ignition
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
18% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
6.3% fail on
Rbt
- 6.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.3% fail on
Rbt
-
2.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
6.3% fail on
Service brake performance
- 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.3% fail on Hand lever
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.3% fail on Lever
-
1.3% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
1.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.3% fail on Other braking system component
-
1.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
1.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
16% fail on
Suspension
- 8.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint
-
2.5% fail on
Other suspension component
- 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.3% fail on
Springs
-
1.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.3% fail on Coil spring
-
1.3% fail on
Coil springs
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
5.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 5.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
3.8% fail on
Chassis
- 3.8% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.3% fail on
Transmission
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.3% fail on Joints
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
-
5.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
10% fail on
Visibility
- 8.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.5% fail on Washers
-
10% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
10% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 10% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
10% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp
-
2.5% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.5% fail on Horn (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamps
-
5.1% fail on
Tyres
- 5.1% fail on Tread depth
-
3.8% fail on
Steering
-
3.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint
-
3.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates